WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Yes, but in general California seems to love them far more that it should.

[–] 6 pts (edited )

Maybe the court was packed with women who have now a problem with trannies... Cheating husbands maybe... Daughter getting rekt on the playing field... Or maybe it's just all about the money for a change. Or maybe it's a bit of all of that, who knows...

...

The State of California Third District Court of Appeals ruled that a state law requiring the use of preferred pronouns by nursing home workers violated their free speech rights.

The court struck down the pro-transgender regulation on Friday in a unanimous 3-0 decision.

The provision was a part of the LGBTQ Long-Term Care Facility Residents' Bill of Rights passed in 2017 and signed into law by then-Governor Jerry Brown. The bill's author, state senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), released a statement lambasting the decision.

"The Court's decision is disconnected from the reality facing transgender people," said senator Weiner.

Oh yeah, I'm sure it's the court that is disconnected from reality here. Weiner fuckingfucks...

"Deliberately misgendering a transgender person isn't just a matter of opinion, and it's not simply 'disrespectful, discourteous, or insulting.' Rather, it's straight up harassment," he continued.

"And, it erases an individual's fundamental humanity, particularly one as vulnerable as a trans senior in a nursing home," Weiner concluded. "This misguided decision cannot be allowed to stand."

Oh the humanity!

The law could have punished a health care provider with a year in prison and as much as a $1,000 fine for "prolonged" abuse involving the violation of the provisions including the misuse of preferred pronouns. Sponsors of the bill defended the bill by saying such a punishment would be rarely enforced in only the most extreme cases.

Equality California, who sponsored the legislation, also released a statement through a spokesperson decrying the unanimous ruling by the court.

"Let's be clear: refusing to use someone's correct name and pronouns isn't an issue of free speech — it's a hateful act that denies someone their dignity and truth," said Rick Chavez Zbur, an executive director of Equality California.

Zyklon mass murder and niggers in cages!

"California's nursing home patients deserve better than this — and we'll be fighting until this decision is overturned," he added.

Just shoot the trannies with moderna already you biggot!

[–] 2 pts

The best part is they are implying that trannies will see old age. Yeah, ok

[–] 1 pt

If people don't like what attendants call them they can always either take care of themselves or go to another facility dedicated to coddling trannies (i am sure some will pop up)

[–] 1 pt

The problem here, is that we have a population/generation, expecting others to live according to their expectations, they believe they are naturally entitled to "just that"

Well, at some point the brutal reality just inserts itself

[–] 1 pt

nursing home workers

it sets a legal precedent.

[–] 1 pt

If the decision isn't reversed on appeal of course...

Now, to me, it's constitutionally sound, but that's just me. I'm not part of any partisan panel that would eventually have the last say here...