Despite all their flaws, "pajeets" in general, understand fundamental civilizational concepts, such as commerce and the imperatives in terms of organization and labor attached to it. The violently retarded savages they are shooting at just never did and never will.
I get that's true. I just can't get my head around the street-shitter idea. It's so fucked.
In the future, in the west, while we'll certainly see societies divided along ethnic lines for obvious reasons, what we'll also see emerging are the the civilized/"civilization able" on one side vs, on the other side, the hordes of retarded murderers dindu muhdicks
It'll be like a Venn diagram of territories / civilizations, where the functioning have their territory with a middle zone where each functions with the other. Like The Man In The High Castle had for the US of the Nazi half and the Japanese half and a middle zone. However that middle zone accepted others of which ... I digress.
Just like the so called "great reset", the so called "NWO" is the solution people don't want
Now I get that we've been brought to this catch22 type of situation, on purpose.
"useless eaters"
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=useless%20eaters
>A term implied in National Security Study Memorandum 200 written by Henry Kissinger. It basically implies that there are too many "useless eaters" consuming valuable resources would be better used by a "reduced" world population.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Study_Memorandum_200#Key_insights
"The U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries [see National Commission on Materials Policy, Towards a National Materials Policy: Basic Data and Issues, April 1972]. That fact gives the U.S. enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States.... The location of known reserves of higher grade ores of most minerals favors increasing dependence of all industrialized regions on imports from less developed countries. The real problems of mineral supplies lie, not in basic physical sufficiency, but in the politico-economic issues of access, terms for exploration and exploitation, and division of the benefits among producers, consumers, and host country governments" [Chapter III, "Minerals and Fuel"].
"Whether through government action, labor conflicts, sabotage, or civil disturbance, the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized. Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth" [Chapter III, "Minerals and Fuel"].
"Populations with a high proportion of growth. The young people, who are in much higher proportions in many LDCs, are likely to be more volatile, unstable, prone to extremes, alienation and violence than an older population. These young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the government or real property of the 'establishment,' 'imperialists,' multinational corporations, or other -- often foreign -- influences blamed for their troubles" [Chapter V, "Implications of Population Pressures for National Security"].
"We must take care that our activities should not give the appearance to the LDCs of an industrialized country policy directed against the LDCs. Caution must be taken that in any approaches in this field we support in the LDCs are ones we can support within this country. "Third World" leaders should be in the forefront and obtain the credit for successful programs. In this context it is important to demonstrate to LDC leaders that such family planning programs have worked and can work within a reasonable period of time." [Chapter I, "World Demographic Trends"]
"In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion." Abortion as a geopolitical strategy is mentioned several dozen times in the report with suggestive implications: "No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion.... under developing country conditions foresight methods not only are frequently unavailable but often fail because of ignorance, lack of preparation, misuse and non-use. Because of these latter conditions, increasing numbers of women in the developing world have been resorting to abortion.... Population control and population reduction tactics.
"Populations with a high proportion of growth. The young people, who are in much higher proportions in many LDCs, are likely to be more volatile, unstable, prone to extremes, alienation and violence than an older population. These young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the government or real property of the 'establishment,' 'imperialists,' multinational corporations, or other -- often foreign -- influences blamed for their troubles" [Chapter V, "Implications of Population Pressures for National Security"].
AKA
Import the 3rd world become the 3rd world
Though when I was in grade-school 1st/2nd/3rd world had nothing to do with economic prosperity but had to do with the economic system used, where 3rd world was socialist / communist and 1st was capitalist. Forget 2nd, maybe that was socialist?
"No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion...
I fully disagree with that. The issue is that the natural method of "population reduction" isn't actual population reduction as an act but of birth-rate control. It's how nature does it and it's clearly not studied in human populations due to it not being attributed to being naturally done by the population with no thought or planning at all. White populations throughout history... FOREVER have done this. Only create what you can sustain, "throttle back" when you out pace your ability. No abortion necessary, just a difficult generation. SINGLE generation to even out.
So this is ascribing a specifically and contextually necessary solution of one group (nonWhites), to an incompatible second group (Whites). However reading between the lines I don't think I'm saying anything new. I'd bet that the goal is specifically the act of " ascribing a specifically and contextually necessary solution of one group (nonWhites), to an incompatible second group (Whites)" to not control the population, but to decimate the population.
>"In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."
I guess that's the key takeaway here
Deception is paramount
Sums it up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5dBZDSSky0
I had to shit in a trash can the other day. Cause I clogged my toilet. It was clogged for like 24 hours. I was pouring drain cleaner and dish soap down that thing. I couldn’t get it. I couldn’t hold it any longer. I eat too much fiber so my shit is hard as rocks. So gross but less gross than say shitting liquid. When it clogs it clogs hard. It looks like rabbit shit. Praise Jesus that fucker finally got unclogged. That’s the second time Iv done that. It happens when I forget to flush too many times
Not supposed to put drain cleaner down the toilet. But then again idk if you’re being serious or not.
Yes I’m Serious. I eat a lot of fiber.’only once I started this diet did I start clogging the toilet without toilet paper so once it gets clogged up it’s a bitch sometimes to get it unstuck. I mean you can only sit there and plunge so long before you realize it’s not doing any good. Then go to sleep and wake up and have to shit. What other options in a 1 bedroom apartment do you have? I don’t live in the woods I can’t run outside. I figured drain cleaner would eat some of that up. Why aren’t you supposed to put it down the drain? Is it not the same as a kitchen sink?
(post is archived)