I hate the words racism and racist. Anti white propaganda
I hate the words racism and racist. Anti white propaganda
I honestly wish people did understand the development of marxist thought more and could understand the solid logic in showing why it's wrong. I want people to understand how base theory is the muse behind critical theory and thus critical race theory. I'd like people to know what these things are and why they are wrong instead of being in bewilderment because "smart person" said big words. And I'd like people to see how base theory demonstrates marx's complete abandonment from logic, and how everything that flows from it is psuedo-intellectualism.
Marxist act like their memorization of history around their ideologies proves that they are right. You take bad logic, and then stack 180 years of history on top of it, it doesn't suddenly become correct.
Base theory was introduced by Marx by describing that coal shoveling is a crappy job that only a poor person would do, and that steam powered equipment, aka capital, only returns value to an investor if someone is there to shovel coal. So Marx assumed that means that the existance of steam powered equipment must create poor people to ensure its own usefulness. But this doesn't consider that there were poor people before its creation, and that no person would agree to take a job shoveling coal unless it improved their situation, so their situation must have been worse before it, or that if poor people cease to exist and people stop shoveling coal then the investor will lose money and that is one potential outcome and shouldn't be logically ruled out. It also fails to describe any mechanism where by the steam equipment exerted its will to make someone poor (no description of mechanics).
It's the same as saying that humanity needs the sun to be hot, and therefore it is humanity that makes the sun hot. "This thing needs this condition, therefore the need creates the condition." It sounds smart but is really quite dumb and is an abdication of real logic. And that is Marx. Every turn of it is an abdication of real logic, phrased in a this therefore that syntax, and therefore read by morons as being logic. There are even worse parts to Marx's logic. Read his explanation on why communism is inevitable and you'll realize you've read the dumbest thing you've ever read. Or his argument that his detractors can be disregarded.. on the grounds that they disagree with him.
Study Marx, so you too can know what an idiot he is, and can demonstrate it in public when his idiotic ideas are argued.
I honestly wish people did understand the development of marxist thought more and could understand the solid logic in showing why it's wrong. I want people to understand how base theory is the muse behind critical theory and thus critical race theory. I'd like people to know what these things are and why they are wrong instead of being in bewilderment because "smart person" said big words. And I'd like people to see how base theory demonstrates marx's complete abandonment from logic, and how everything that flows from it is psuedo-intellectualism.
Marxist act like their memorization of history around their ideologies proves that they are right. You take bad logic, and then stack 180 years of history on top of it, it doesn't suddenly become correct.
Base theory was introduced by Marx by describing that coal shoveling is a crappy job that only a poor person would do, and that steam powered equipment, aka capital, only returns value to an investor if someone is there to shovel coal. So Marx assumed that means that the existance of steam powered equipment must create poor people to ensure its own usefulness. But this doesn't consider that there were poor people before its creation, and that no person would agree to take a job shoveling coal unless it improved their situation, so their situation must have been worse before it, or that if poor people cease to exist and people stop shoveling coal then the investor will lose money and that is one potential outcome and shouldn't be logically ruled out. It also fails to describe any mechanism where by the steam equipment exerted its will to make someone poor (no description of mechanics).
It's the same as saying that humanity needs the sun to be hot, and therefore it is humanity that makes the sun hot. "This thing needs this condition, therefore the need creates the condition." It sounds smart but is really quite dumb and is an abdication of real logic. And that is Marx. Every turn of it is an abdication of real logic, phrased in a this therefore that syntax, and therefore read by morons as being logic. There are even worse parts to Marx's logic. Read his explanation on why communism is inevitable and you'll realize you've read the dumbest thing you've ever read. Or his argument that his detractors can be disregarded.. on the grounds that they disagree with him.
Study Marx, so you too can know what an idiot he is, and can demonstrate it in public when his idiotic ideas are argued.
I guess I should go on to describe how that relates to critical theory. So base theory went on to further argue that because physical goods can "exert their will" like steam equipment willed that someone is poor (bad logic), that this effect not only exists (it doesn't), but is so encompassing and potent that the presence of capital is responsible for the nature of humanity (or at least all the bad parts of it selectively). Therefore to improve humanity you must get rid of all capital.
Later as the Frankfurt school took the mantel of communism this was adjusted to "narratives" taking on that role instead of capital. This is critical theory. It says that to improve humanity you just need to make it believe the correct narratives even if they aren't true at all (add post modernism to believe that truth doesn't exist anyway). Or to put it differently, everything that is bad in humanity is a result of a narrative, and thus has to be pruned, even if it is based in reality, just as capital was responsible for anything negative about humanity. What is dis-considered is that the flaws of humanity can have multiple sources and that such dogmatic assumptions about the origins of all human flaws is going to lead to stupidity.
Critical race theory is an attempt to explain race theory via critical theory. That is that black people are bad because they heard bad narratives. You can see one's real motives in their abandonment of their own logic. If that were true, and black people were more likely to hear about Harriet Tubman and slavery, then maybe if the narratives one grew up with were to blame we should stop feeding those narratives to children. But that wouldn't feed into their anti-white ideology. But of course we know that real reason blacks can't get along in society. It's genetics, and the real science backs it up.
I guess I should go on to describe how that relates to critical theory. So base theory went on to further argue that because physical goods can "exert their will" like steam equipment willed that someone is poor (bad logic), that this effect not only exists (it doesn't), but is so encompassing and potent that the presence of capital is responsible for the nature of humanity (or at least all the bad parts of it selectively). Therefore to improve humanity you must get rid of all capital.
Later as the Frankfurt school took the mantel of communism this was adjusted to "narratives" taking on that role instead of capital. This is critical theory. It says that to improve humanity you just need to make it believe the correct narratives even if they aren't true at all (add post modernism to believe that truth doesn't exist anyway). Or to put it differently, everything that is bad in humanity is a result of a narrative, and thus has to be pruned, even if it is based in reality, just as capital was responsible for anything negative about humanity. What is dis-considered is that the flaws of humanity can have multiple sources and that such dogmatic assumptions about the origins of all human flaws is going to lead to stupidity.
Critical race theory is an attempt to explain race theory via critical theory. That is that black people are bad because they heard bad narratives. You can see one's real motives in their abandonment of their own logic. If that were true, and black people were more likely to hear about Harriet Tubman and slavery, then maybe if the narratives one grew up with were to blame we should stop feeding those narratives to children. But that wouldn't feed into their anti-white ideology. But of course we know that real reason blacks can't get along in society. It's genetics, and the real science backs it up.
It was a way for lawyers to get more convictions by inventing more crimes to punish. A way to criminalize race. The theory is bunk, with less supporting evidence for the ideas than there are of big foot and flat earth.
It was a way for lawyers to get more convictions by inventing more crimes to punish. A way to criminalize race. The theory is bunk, with less supporting evidence for the ideas than there are of big foot and flat earth.
So many people fail to understand this. Always call it like it is: anti-whiteism. Almost no one has the time or brain capacity to understand the marxist origins of it, or how it's ahistorical or whatever. Facts and logic DO NOT work on the population at large which is why these people will never win going that route. By calling it anti-white, it becomes an emotional call to arms to defend yourself and your children from the psychological and spiritual warfare being waged against you for being white.
So many people fail to understand this. Always call it like it is: anti-whiteism. Almost no one has the time or brain capacity to understand the marxist origins of it, or how it's ahistorical or whatever. Facts and logic DO NOT work on the population at large which is why these people will never win going that route. By calling it anti-white, it becomes an emotional call to arms to defend yourself and your children from the psychological and spiritual warfare being waged against you for being white.
No whites really believe that they need to help the "less" powerful groups
No whites really believe that they need to help the "less" powerful groups
(post is archived)