If he is, they might manufacture a bullshit case like this. It depends on the actual things he did but a lot of relatively innocent stuff could be prosecuted under these statutes. And also people usually don’t wait until 47 to go on a perv spree. All that’s fishy as hell. And that one supposed victim is a young child but another is an adult? He didn’t get caught being a perv his entire adult life and then suddenly he’s trying to rape adults and kids? This doesn’t make alot of sense. Of course they don’t give us the real details, just the statutes hes charged under, which sound really bad but they are in fact broad.
If he effed a kid then fuck him, but I couldn’t verify it. Sometimes we get the details with these cases. Why not here?
I think they are using these pedophile type charges as political weapons because conservatives always believe them. Im starting to think we shouldn’t assume things are as they seem with these cases.
(post is archived)