These three "freedom fighters" are jackasses. Unless they have case law at the federal or state level showing otherwise, a law or ordinance is constitutional until proven through the court system to be unconstitutional. Those police officers simply did their job correctly.
This is of course under the presumption of agreeing with the system in the first place. But these guys kept saying, "Muh Constitution," and therefore must be assumed to accept the system.
One of the retards at some point seemed to want to cite case law, but seemed to fumble. In any case, you go to court to fight it, or do Civil Disobedience and keep filming, get arrested for trespass, lawyer up, then fight it in court. That's how the system works.
Besides, the Constitution was a legal coup. A bunch of elected and powerful men got behind closed doors in Philadelphia, overthrew the Articles of the Confederation, came out, and said, "Hey guys, seriously, this is our new law system. You have no say."
E: Imagine if Congress today went behind closed doors, wrote bullshit Constitution Tyranny 2.0, came out, and said, "This is the new law of the land. Constituion 1.0 is invalid."
The Supreme Court has already rule that recording in public buildings and public officials is a Constitutionally protected activity. The courts don’t need to rule on every tiny city or county’s ordinances when such a clear ruling exists.
Okay. I agree. Then the jackasses should have done Civil Disobedience and gotten arrested to pursue a civil lawsuit.
I think what you posted is what the one guy might have been trying to bring up. In any case, they started a shit storm and didn't follow all the way through. Agreed?
Agreed
(post is archived)