Looking at the study results, Moderna's claim of "100% effective" for ages 12-17 required giving the vaccine to 466 children to prevent a single child from getting the Wuhuflu, for a total of four (4) protected children out of 1866. All for a sickness that has a 99.997% survival rate in that age group.
Looking at the study results, Moderna's claim of "100% effective" for ages 12-17 required giving the vaccine to 466 children to prevent a single child from getting the Wuhuflu, for a total of four (4) protected children out of 1866. All for a sickness that has a 99.997% survival rate in that age group.
Yes! They are the lowest age group as it is for catching it so its practically zero protection! They have a 100 percent survivable chance as it is. It's mind boggling that many parents, or any parents, blindly allowed this to be injected into their precious child. It really breaks my heart.
Yes! They are the lowest age group as it is for catching it so its practically zero protection! They have a 100 percent survivable chance as it is. It's mind boggling that many parents, or any parents, blindly allowed this to be injected into their precious child. It really breaks my heart.
It's unfathomable how they approved it when children died during the study. And just so a few kids didn't get the sniffles?
It's unfathomable how they approved it when children died during the study. And just so a few kids didn't get the sniffles?
(post is archived)