Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

328

May. 24, 2021

Filmmaker Abby Martin secured a major victory for free speech on Monday after a federal court ruled that her First Amendment rights were violated when she was blocked from speaking at Georgia Southern University in 2016 for refusing to "sign a contractual pledge to not boycott Israel" in compliance with Georgia's anti-Boycott, Divest and Sanctions law.

"I am thrilled at the judge's decision finding this law unconstitutional as it so clearly violates the free speech rights of myself and so many others in Georgia," Abby Martin said in a statement on Twitter. "My First Amendment rights were restricted on behalf of a foreign government, which flies in the face of the principles of freedom and democracy."

Martin continued: "The government of Israel has pushed state legislatures to enact these laws only because they know that sympathy and support for the population they brutalize, occupy, ethnically cleanse and subject to apartheid, is finally growing in popular consciousness -- they want to hold back the tide of justice by preemptively restricting the right of American citizens to peacefully take a stand against their crimes."

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62256

Good win for free speech, and a loss for Israel, Zionists, and AIPAC the Israeli lobby.

May. 24, 2021 Filmmaker Abby Martin secured a major victory for free speech on Monday after a federal court ruled that her First Amendment rights were violated when she was blocked from speaking at Georgia Southern University in 2016 for refusing to "sign a contractual pledge to not boycott Israel" in compliance with Georgia's anti-Boycott, Divest and Sanctions law. "I am thrilled at the judge's decision finding this law unconstitutional as it so clearly violates the free speech rights of myself and so many others in Georgia," Abby Martin said in a statement on Twitter. "My First Amendment rights were restricted on behalf of a foreign government, which flies in the face of the principles of freedom and democracy." Martin continued: "The government of Israel has pushed state legislatures to enact these laws only because they know that sympathy and support for the population they brutalize, occupy, ethnically cleanse and subject to apartheid, is finally growing in popular consciousness -- they want to hold back the tide of justice by preemptively restricting the right of American citizens to peacefully take a stand against their crimes." https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62256 Good win for free speech, and a loss for Israel, Zionists, and AIPAC the Israeli lobby.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (34).
[–] • 16 pts

Huh a judge who read the law and upholds them. Weird

[–] • 6 pts

Where should I send flowers? Direct to the funeral home or should it go to the surviving family members?

[–] • 4 pts

I was quite sad to hear how he committed suicide with two shotgun blasts to the back.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

and how his wife and kids were driving to the grocery store 7 months later when all of a sudden the car accelerated to 140mph, and crashed straight into a light pole.

[–] • 1 pt

If you fall on a double barrel just right and the trigger is faulty and between 80 and 84° with the moon in waxing, while a g man is pulling the trigger then yes its very possible.

[–] • 0 pt

Only the good and flexible die young.

[–] • 0 pt

For the judge or for our country?

[–] • 0 pt

There are no serving members of outer country.