Because the shots were pitched as, effectively, stacking immunity whereby if you had a 99% or survival before you now had something like a 99.9% chance of survival. Nevermind that that was bullshit...there's a strong correlation between having had the poison shots and now getting dying from various afflictions including making your more likely to get infected and less likely to fight off that infection.
The shots are liquid genocide.
“ shots were pitched as, effectively, stacking immunity whereby if you had a 99% or survival before you now had something like a 99.9% chance of survival.”
That seems about right based on recent research figures. Why do you not think this is the case? Run the numbers.
Because there seems to be a correlation between getting the shots -- and having natural immunity/antibodies wiped out -- and getting infected. Higher change of getting infected plus reduced ability to fight off said infection is not only < 99.9% its < 99%. They are net-negative on just this axis.
Once you start adding in suspicious of sterilizations, blood clotting, heart attacks, antibody dependent enhancement, etc etc whatever risk:reward might have been defensible is completely out the window.
The best hot read on the shots at this point is Darwin-Award-via-intellectual-laziness.
Because there seems to be a correlation between getting the shots -- and having natural immunity/antibodies wiped out -- and getting infected.
Where are you seeing this correlation?
Once you start adding in suspicious of sterilizations, blood clotting, heart attacks, antibody dependent enhancement, etc
How many cases of these per 100,000 vaccines administered are there?
(post is archived)