The answer you’re looking for is “we don’t have time for established routes as there is a pandemic occurring and the planet would collapse if we stuck to current established routes”
Standard practice is 10 years and uber safe. However we don’t have 10 years for this one particular vaccine, but we do have many years of studies on the effects of similar variants.
Pitting the known risks of the mRNA vaccines against the known risk of the COVID virus, the vaccines win by orders of magnitude in terms of calculated risk.
If you have concerns, put numbers on them.
So what you are saying, is that is fine that we did not follow standard practice given the circumstances? Right?
I am saying that the balance of risk vs reward is weighed very heavily in favour of the vaccine that has proven to be safe, in opposition to the virus which has proven to be deadly.
Hey I’m not saying the vaccine is 100% safe but if it’s safer than the virus, which it demonstrably is, then I’ll go with that option thank you.
OK and I can see that.
You said "known" risks earlier. Why didn't you chose to use that word now?
Because if we end up with a massive batch of teratogenesis and cancers and mutations...then I'd very much rather take my chances with getting sick.
What is the death rate in your age group btw?
And another word you used is the word "option".
Do you really have an option to take or not take the vaccine?
What would you call it when you are not allowed to commute freely, enter grocery stores, risk losing your job?
Would you say "Heavily encouraged"?
(post is archived)