The whole article reeks of ideological subversion to me. My propaganda sense is telling me this is probably russian in origin but the russians largely subscribe to Goebble's theories of propaganda, the truth is the best propaganda, the half truths here are what can be measured and I think point to russia, they don't want westerners thinking that soviet jews invented antifa to help them take over germany; westerners could easily garble this message and hate modern russia for it, if the history is inconvenient why mention it? I think people should read all of the article, what we are seeing is that our enemy was training some antifa in a proxy war they created while also making ground connections with potential allied movements in the region, this indicates intelligence sharing on a level we haven't had such evidence of to my knowledge, it can further disclose enemy intentions, they want antifa to be a standing paramilitary force in north america for a generation at least, with practical experience in a civil war and being on a multifront war, this also likely explains why they have been shielding people who went to fight in syria, they don't want any scrutiny on the antifa coming and going. I would say we should have organized Christian men to go defend Christian villages from ISIS so that our white militias could have more practical war fighting experience but honestly, most of our militias have veterans enough and had any of our boys gone over there israel would have found a reason to bomb them or ISIS would have redirected their entire force at israel's behest.