I tried to explain this exact thing to my doctor and was told "It can't change your DNA it doesn't even enter the cell". I honestly can't believe most doctors are allowed to practice. This plandemic has certainly highlighted just how many of them are idiots.
Reverse transcription doesn't exist? LOL
Doctors don't even do their own research. They just start raking in the cash from their drug dealing and they stop caring about learning.
The argument got really heated (on his side, I just calmly stated facts). He kept asking where I got my information and I cited the CDC, WHO, Oxford University etc, and he just would not accept it. He started quoting things he had seen on the news, and when he finally took a breath I said "So you get your medical information from the tv?" That shut him up pretty quick. It really opened my eyes... and this guy was considered to be a really good doctor. Really makes me wonder just how awful the bad ones are.
The bad ones are going to be twerking over your brain damaged vegetable body while they do open cavity surgery on you (this really happened, sheboon doctor).
Jew?
I noticed this years ago because my wife always researches every single problem she has health wise to the point of exhaustion of the topic, so when she'd go talk to the doctors about it she'd be telling them all this shit that's is way out of their wheelhouse because they don't bother to keep up with information in their own field.
And my wife doesn’t understand why I second guess the docs constantly. They’re car-mechanics working on the world’s most complex biological systems. They learn to clinically treat the squeak with medical grease, hope the squeak goes away, then are surprised when what they did doesn’t work. There’s no time for them to do research and reading. Hospitals track all hours the doc spends- and any that are not patient hours is a mark against them for productivity. They are unable to properly deal with any situations outside of common knowledge.
Exactly.
"It can't change your DNA it doesn't even enter the cell"
I'm quite sure he said "It can't change your DNA, it doesn't even enter the nucleus of the cell". Some viruses can change your DNA, but they need to produce a ton of different proteins that enter the nucleus to do that. The mRNA vaccines do not contain the blueprints for these proteins.
Except that there’s literature out there that directly shows it happens with reverse transcriptase action. With the complexity of the human body systems, it’s hubris to believe we understand the effects of this therapy.
What if there’s bad production of the jab? (As cited in the EU through whistle blower emails? Partial protein chains- i.e. poor production of the replicated mRNA? What about poor encapsulation? What about cell genetic replication mistakes? (What happens with 1% replication error? What about 5% error?). Crispr Cas9 was supposed to be brilliantly perfect- then they learned it was more complex than that, and it’s hard to control. We’re still learning. This is dangerous.
You are right, there can be unintended consequences, and they should make long-term trials first to make sure that there is no surprise waiting. On the other hand, it is a very long way from inserting genetic material into a cell and actually change the genetic material of a cell. Just putting an RNA sequence outside the nucleus and hoping it will merge with the DNA does not work.
All this talk about "this is not a vaccine but a gene therapy" is initiated by people who have just understood that RNA has something to do with genes and therefore must be dangerous. And they all miss the point that the antigen presenting cell gets eaten anyway by a killer cell, suicide by cop.
People fearing gene manipulation should keep an eye on the viral vector vaccines instead. They produce the RNA inside the nucleus, dangerously near the DNA. And they do it with adenoviruses, similar to the ones used in the 30 or so commercial available gene therapies.
(post is archived)