> If we look at the CDC numbers, they asterix that only 5% of cases had no comorbidities. 5% of the death certificates had no other entry than C19. This is suspicious, because a death certificate should also contain the terminal event that led to the death (heart failure, for example). > I'm not sure we even need a cure. We need the cures for the same reason they fight against anything that could count as a cure: As soon as the FDA has to fully approve a cure, the emergency approvals for the vaccines are invalid. This is why they made trials with HCQ overdoses that killed people, or why the antibody cocktails (like the one from Regeneron that saved Trump) only get a partially approval for "risk groups". > Every time you examine closer, you find more dishonesty; intentional, widespread and controlled from the top. True that. But they also feed us with red herrings to discredit us. I've met an old lady at Gab who was devastated because people had convinced her that all her vaccinated friends will die soon. This should not happen. So if in doubt, every theory remains a working theory until there is a peer reviewed consent. > Not even money fits into this equation They already have it all. Now they want to form a new society. And they see the billions of lab rats that can be useful for medical experiments. > And the S Spike protein variants... they aren't that worrisome. The spike protein itself is worrisome because it can cause the endothelial cells of the blood vessels to die by just attaching to ACE, without entering the cell. But the variants are not more worrisome than the original, because the Fau Chi paid gain-of-function research led to such a highly optimized version that nature cannot do it better.