It is true that they have to compare a new RNA sequence with old ones to determine if they have found what they are looking for. For example, they compared the SARS 2.0 sequences with version 1.0 and MERS. Then they must look at the differences to find out if they make sense. Or if they have just found some random garbage. They do it by looking at the proteins coded by the differences. This can be done by computer models, but they can also actually produce the proteins to test their function with cell cultures.
Now, let's isolate SARS COV 2, since we have millions of purported cases to confirm.
This was done some 100,000 times. Maybe you don't trust western scientists, but Indian scientists have done that too. And Pakistani, because they don't trust the Indians. And scientists from 100 other countries. The results are collected in an open access database:
https://www.gisaid.org/hcov19-variants/
Of course, you will not trust their sponsors (neither do I), but the good thing about science is that they all watch each other with suspicion.
If you look at BLAST at the genomes, there is only the single reference genome.
Other sequences are saying they are sequenced, but only verifying as little as 30 base pairs. For this reason, those 275k sequenced samples are actually only select segments.
In fact, PANGOLIN has even restructured the How To on phylogenetic standards which is why there are so many variants.
Imagine if they faked a genome so that these segments would show false positives as much as possible... intentionally. A digitally generated chimera with just enough congruencies to catch as many of the stop and start sequences as possible.
SARS COV tests were being used until April 2020, as SARS COV 2 tests had not even been invented. Already, tremendous creative license was being taken.
To date, no one has done a gapless sequencing of any notable length of SARS COV 2. That's really what I'm looking for. Not the whole thing, but enough to be convincing.
What is happening now is they are subtracting out sequences for everything they don't want to find before they've even started, so that they only find what they want.
For me, the most important thing is to find the cures. While some cures were found because doctors were wondering why people on some medications were less affected than others (Famotidine for example, part of Trump's cure), other medications were found because the mechanics of spike protein are well known. It is relative easy to research the spike protein because it can be produced out of the sequences in the databases.
They have found that the virus cannot enter the cells without a modification of the spike protein after it binds to ACE2, and that a protein called TMPRSS2 does exactly that. This is why we know that TMPRSS2 inhibitors can stop the virus from infecting cells, which leads to a variety of medications. After that, they did trials like this one with Bromhexine (cheap and OTC in Europe):
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32983936/
Of course, such trials can only take place in countries where the pharma industry cannot stop them. And, of course, nobody reacted to the positive results. The FDA hides positive results because a cure would stop the emergency approvals for the vaccines. And the research anons, who could spread the message, are neutralized by the "it's the flu" red herring, so FDA, CDC and WHO can continue to hide the cures without getting challenged.
If we look at the CDC numbers, they asterix that only 5% of cases had no comorbidities. This brings us less than 20,000 deaths. I'm not sure we even need a cure.
This assumes, of course, the testing was accurate. Unfortunately, the antigen and antibody test will show positive for any coronavirus. This has been ignored entirely by the media and medical industry. For this reason, 5% is statistically insignificant; in that there are very likely only false positives in the tally.
The PCR tests aren't much better given the similar open reading frames and extra cycles exacerbated by intentionally excluding other potential results like the flu. All PCR tests state plainly there can be contraindications with other strains and even other species entirely.
Then, we have the facemask issue where people are wearing pathogens on their face that are percolating at ideal temperature and humidity for them to survive and reproduce. Have you tried these in a petri dish, yet? Youtube took my video down.
So, the numbers... the deaths, the positive test cases... it's a smoke screen. Every time you examine closer, you find more dishonesty; intentional, widespread and controlled from the top.
I posit the Trump cures are merely cures for many ailments that have been used by the elite for a long time. I also posit that antifungals are being suppressed asthey would drop the rate of cancer dramatically.
Even dandruff is lied about. The cure is simple... chlorohexadine glucosate and ketoconazole with some zinc and sulfates. It's a co infection, staph and fungal. They will sell you any of these useful ingredients in a shampoo, but none of them together in order to treat it instead of cure it.
What we see with the medical industry, this type of corruption, it applies to vaccines, too, but it requires "appealing to authority" reliance... demanding obedience from puppet leaders. There is no logic behind protective measures other than to assert authoritarianism. Not even money fits into this equation other than to pay the bribes to politicians and experts, shills, astroturfers and news anchors.
And the S Spike protein variants... they aren't that worrisome. The reason is because the variation can only go so far before it won't fit like a puzzle piece onto the ACE 2 receptor. The S spike variations that fit more loosely are the new ones and they seemingly have some resistance, as a result. However, the loose fit also is detrimental to its efficacy.
(post is archived)