Even for those over 60, the chance of dying is still very slim. Furthermore, MIT has found that whether you’re 6’ or 60’ away, it makes no difference. I’m not sure what unit of measurement you use in Tel Aviv. I figure you’ve stolen leeched so much off of us, you’d steal imperial measurements as well. The masks are ineffective as well, so I must ask... if the masks don’t work, social distancing doesn’t work and the virus still has a 99.something chance of survival for those over 60, why would I buy into your bull shit narrative.
Can you please post a picture of your talking point sheet? Someone from JIDF did a while back, and I want to see if they update it.
Slim? Not at all, the mortality rate is incredibly high, much higher than the flu which we treat with a yearly vaccine already. Even under 60 there have been around 80,000 deaths which isn’t something to just be ignored.
Social distancing and lockdowns have been proven to work countless times, but I agree with you on the masks, they’re likely ineffective.
You say we shouldn't ignore 80k deaths, yet society ignores over 200k a year from medical mistakes.... More people die from car wrecks than gun violence yet we push the gun agenda. An agenda is being pushed, and you're a part of it, since you question nothing you're being told. Have you seen the covid death percent for Vietnam? Thailand? Covid hit the obese hard, as does the flu. So arguing for a loss of civil liberties to protect someone's poor life choices is an agenda you're a part of.
(post is archived)