WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

145

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

Somehow I don't expect I will like the court decision. Government is not our friend and does not represent its citizens.

[–] 1 pt

It's important to remember scotus is not the final word. We are.

[–] 3 pts

The second amendment doesn't grant any rights. It's there to restrict government.

[–] 1 pt

...the same court, that wholly ignored 2020 election fraud.

The only difference between a politician and a SC Justice is that an SC Justice is appointed for life, which makes them more expensive for the (((handlers))) to buy and own.

Our government has a problem.

[–] 1 pt

Don't hold your breath. They will vote 5-4 and uphold the current status quo after about 3 to 4 false flags with intelligence compromised individuals.

[–] 0 pt

This could be a turning point tipping the scales to a full-blown revolution. I'm kind of hoping they rule against right to carry.

It's time.

[–] 0 pt

Isn't this a good thing?

It sounds like this could block states from restricting gun ownership

[–] 0 pt

I'm OK with states trying stupid experiments. There are other states.

[–] 0 pt

Change 'all rise' to 'bow down and kiss the ground' and you have the governments thoughts on what they think of us.

[–] 0 pt

If they rule against NY’s law, the Dems will use it as the basis to add 4 justices. I guarantee Roberts knows this and will rule in favor of the restrictions, maybe even increasing the scope of the restrictions- effectively re writing it as he did for Obamacare and many other cases.