I thought some more about what you wrote. You do have a really good point in more ways than I realize.
For example, what I was suggesting could be done, sure. But. I was just reviewing leftist tactics and I also realized that the economics of pulling something like that off would be unbelievable. It could be done because our side can get millions and millions of people out at a moments notice. If Trump just asked, he could have had 80 million people in the streets shutting everything down. But he is sales and not leadership.
What the left does is think big but act small, cheap and optically effective. They are REALLY REALLY good at what they do. They pick tiny narrative sleeves, pull together a tiny force of cheap organizers that truly believe and whip up the emotions of the base. Of course, it helps they have propaganda scaling capabilities because of their co-conspirators in media, but it is very very effective.
Here is an example of them switching gears to keep making new plays: https://odysee.com/@TimcastIRL:8/blm-takes-up-new-narrative-in-case-of:0
So, as you said, we have no leadership. But, we also tend to think too big, too broad, too expensive and sometimes too end of times.
The economics of the latter are expensive. The economics of the left are cheap.
The reason that I am an optimist is that it is becoming clear that we aren't in this position because they are winning. We are in this position because we are allowing them to just walk in and take over. We haven't even begun to make plays.
There is real opportunity ahead of us. But, you made a great point. I appreciate that.
(post is archived)