Would it theoretically be possible to retain the geometry / integrity of the manufactured RNA via some type of nanotech? Or is that slightly off-scale?
And the other suggestions have been that the RNA supposedly could modify DNA, to then in the future reproduce . I haven't looked to check for legitimacy on that claim however
The lipid nanoparticle that contains the RNA could hang around for awhile. Who knows how long? If you were intentionally trying to make the nanoparticle last a long time maybe you could prolong the duration that the body was manufacturing spike protein. But at some point the LNP will degrade and the RNA will be used up. Eventually it will be all gone.
I admire your scepticism of Jews and their tyrannical government looming over us. But please don't make shit up about basic biology. I'm not even making fun of you for not understanding. Just don't make a fool of yourself.
RNA is a specific pattern of atoms that floats around in water. The RNA for a "COVID spike protein" is a published and unique sequence of A C G and U. DNA is more or less RNA but with the U's replaced with T's.
It makes no sense to say that they have "special RNA" or that "synthetic RNA" is dangerous RNA. An understandable claim would be that it might be less pure due to its synthesis, but that's not what you expressed.
Lastly, yes, there are viruses that naturally live in the human body that are known to have the necessary RNA to DNA apparatus, that would indeed embed the viral DNA into your DNA.
It will happen in dwindling amounts, but that also happens with any other normal viral infection, with COVID or influenza or a cold.
What are your thoughts on terrain theory and the idea that these viruses are really just exosomes? Koch's postulates?
It's just a normal influenza/cold that Jews have decided to make a huge deal about, now that the tools to track viral infection are available. The entire viral genome has been sequenced in Nepal publication, and uploaded for anyone to examine. It's not make believe. It's just a bad flu strain, but the deaths are wildly exaggerated.
Across deaths, CDC says 2.6 comorbidities on average. 6% had no other serious health conditions (comorbidities). That comes out to about 35,000 zero comorbidity deaths in the USA so far. Influenza usually kills about 60,000 per year (but they don't exaggerate as much for the death causes), so let's say ~50% of those 60,000 were (mostly) old people without other issues dying of influenza: 30,000.
So I'm not really seeing how this is different than a bad flu year, other than the screaming Jews and mouth diapers.
(post is archived)