Not from the perspective of a pole.
I don't even know mainstream narratives because I know it's all garbage. What were they told?
Germany attacked Poland in Danzig because jewish poles were killing German's, correct?
I don't even know mainstream narratives because I know it's all garbage. What were they told?
Story we got told in school is because he was just expansionist and he had gotten away with everything up until that point so why not. Honestly I'd say that's at least partially true. He wanted to at least restore Germany to it's greatest territorial extent. He likely had no idea invading Poland would finally provoke the allies to declare war, since he wasn't aware of their secret treaty and they'd mostly been friendly with him up until then.
Germany attacked Poland in Danzig because jewish poles were killing German's, correct?
And because Polish troops crossed the border for funsies and attacked German border outposts firsts. Except that turned out to be a false flag by the Germans and I'm having trouble finding evidence for the claims about Germans in Danzig being attacked that don't come from the NSDAP.
Plus, Germany had already divided up Poland with the Soviets at that point, so the attack was clearly premeditated, not based on some humanitarian emergency.
Thank you for the info.
What do you mean false flag for the German's?
I don't believe that morality is subjective. A nigger thinks he's doing the right thing by mugging someone in order to get money to buy his negress something nice.
Morality is objective, not subjective. Nazi's were, objectively, the good guys.
If we're talking about objective reality, history is usually more complex than "good guys vs. bad guys."
The reason we talk in those terms is because our emotions are geared towards simple ingroup vs. outgroup calculations. The primary purpose of politics and culture is to determine the outgroup and defend the ingroup, hence Plato's assertion that: "Those who tell the stories rule society."
In the case of modern germany they call Hitler "the bad guy" because those who tell the stories have taught them that they are their own enemies. Hopefully that changes, but either way the only way for Hitler (an invader) to become "the good guy" in Poland is for them to be taught the same lesson, which should not happen and I hope does not happen.
Oh, you'll be interested to know that the part of "Poland" that Hitler "invaded" had been Germany a few years prior and was taken from them as reparations for WWI.
Germany were also the good guys, objectively, in WWI.
It would be like if Mexico started a World War, the US fought and won it and demanded life return to normal, then The Jews in Mexico colluded with the Jews in the US to bring the Jews in Europe into the war. Then Europe comes out of nowhere defeats the US who had done nothing wrong morally or legally, and then gives New York State to Canada. And then Canada starts abusing the residents of what once was New York State. Would America not be justified and reclaiming New York State? That's essentially what happened in post World War I Germany
Poles can suck dick. They were the ones oppressing the native germans living there, Hitler just taught them a lesson in courtesy.
(post is archived)