>What is my kind? How long have I been fighting jews for the white race? Since you are such a fan of making broad assumptions of atheists on here as a whole, i thought you wouldn't mind getting the same treatment in kind. "My rules for thee, but not for me"? >This is why atheists are a joke. You make assumptions based on nothing and treat them as reality. Within the same post, directly after your first statement, you immediately make a hypocrite of yourself, are you a christian or a poe shill?. Whatever, I've been saying the exact same sort of things to Christians on here (just replace "christian" with "atheist"), over and over. Their only attack seems to be taking the stereotype that would never apply to a White Nationalist or user of this site, and accusing the large square peg of fitting into the small round hole. Like I said time and again, I'm no basement-dwelling marxist neckbeard, nor am I a low-IQ wigger psychopath, look to Albert Camus and Frederich Nietzsche (who provides a way of rejecting both christianity and marxism on the basis of their shared values and assumptions, which fit them both into the "slave morality" of the "ublickmenschen" or "common man", yet also reject the libertines who discard morality altogether and descend into fully unrestrained hedonism and living for the moment, even at the expense of others, and the angsty nihilists and the buddhists who believe that life is a purely negative and meaningless experience that is best ended as soon as possible, as both being examples of the "untermenschen" - subhumans, who kill their humanity, what is great about themselves and their existences, and make beasts of themselves by willfully falling into the abyss) and to the theory of evolution (origin of species by natural selection), in particular, the "goals" that the designs of all life are shaped by, the evolutionary origins of morality in humans, and the evolutionary traits that set Western Europeans and Eastern Asians apart from the the other races of the world. Grouping atheists up as one ideological group, like christians, is pretty fucking useless, we don't have anything in common except a lack of belief in some supernatural force that fits most people's description of "God" (including yours), I think it's better to break us down into categories based on what it is we believe in, rather than lump us all into one large group (that hates each other) based on what we don' believe in. I see atheist communities forming on the basis of political divisions, philosophical divisions, even on religious divisions, not only are the ideologies and attitudes vastly different , but the types of people within these groups, from their sub-cultural traits to personality types, are pretty distinct as well. One a hairy fatass, the other is an example of what /fit/ would consider the inspirational ubermenschen, one is far left, the other is far right, their positions on everything from tradition to economics are going to radically diverge from one another. I'd say that that was the downside of the new atheist movement, it put together a large group of people with very little in common beyond the one trait they all DON'T possess, and as a result, the left overtook it, as they always do whenever there is a community to be overtaken, and that community has not been vigilant for the power-lust of the jews, their indoctrinated puppet minions, and their attack dogs in the form of "oppressed minorities". My philosophical attitude is best described as "ayn rand, but for white nationalism" or "judaism for gentiles", taking rand's philosophy for the individual and applying it to the white race, or taking the ideology of jewish supremacy, and placing whites in the place of jews, and jews in the place of the gentile whites (who are seen as such a constant threat that they must be eliminated instead of merely enslaved, though in the case of whites, they are a threat to the jews due to their variability, while the jews are a threat to the whites due to their insidious nature of playing our most noble traits against us). i was like this in mindset long before I read rand or her philosophy, and before I had fully understood the talmudic ideology, it was just that after finding these things, I found I could summarize by opinions easily by making slight changes to these ideas and presenting the altered forms of them. Kind of like what a lot of christians do, taking things from jews, and adapting them. Nothing to be ashamed of, it's a strength of whites, our ability to learn and adapt when we see something we can take something away from, and be better off for it, if indeed we are taking something away from jews, and not just using the way they lay things out to better explain a position we held long before we encountered their influence.