WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Since you are such a fan of making broad assumptions of atheists on here as a whole, i thought you wouldn't mind getting the same treatment in kind.

Dumb faggot. atheism is a jew worship cult that turns you intro a non white worshiping pedo. I am trying to save those retards.

I don't understand you, you are supposed to be the one to have integrity here.

Every time I argue with a Christian on here, it turns out to be a manchild, one who exclusively argues in throwing baseless accusations at me, of being an insulting caricature, claims which are obviously not accurate descriptions of me. I'm not a pedophile, and I don't worship other races, I'm confused as to why you assume these things about me.

It's like I can't talk to you, because you don't even try to say anything.

On that note, I bet you think being a pedophile is the worse crime of the two you listed, believe me, its not, white civilizations have been screwing kids for most of their histories, in fact, much of the couplings you'd have been conceived from would have been considered to have been pedophilic, at least by modern legal standards, white civilization can survive pedophilia.

It's the self-hatred of one's own race, and the worship of other races, that ultimately destroys white civilizations, its been shown that demographics are destiny, and one's racial pride is even more important than one's national pride when it comes to contributing to the survival of one's country, when non-whites are seen as equals to the nation's founding racial stock, when they are granted access and opportunity within our borders, and when they are placed above us, where we stoop down to take up the cause of that vile burden placed on us by aspirations to making equal what nature had decreed not to be so, our civilizations inevitably descend into their decline and fall.

I've encountered arguments in the past, regarding morality in the absence of God, it got me really involved with science and philosophy, and the discussions were polite and insightful, I got to learn a lot about the Bible and enjoyed getting to understand the experience of being the Christian on the other side from me in the conversation.

Although a lot of that mediatation was on ways to justify what my instincts were telling me since 2008, I didn't think there needed to be any philosophical justification, he things that were true were simply so, and the policies I advocated for were simply those which I saw as producing the best results for those that I considered important to me.

But this rudeness, just flinging mud at me, it provokes a similar response from me, and then one of you assholes has the gall to complain when some mud is flung back. "oh! they are generalizing me, and making baseless assumptions about me", is a hollow complaint when it comes from someone who's made that 100% of their own shit-talking strategy.

You are just a child, talking as children do, and your level of rhetoric belongs on a recess-period playground.

[–] 0 pt

I don't understand you, you are supposed to be the one to have integrity here.

Shitty attempt at gaslighting. You don't understand things because you're dumb. Not anything to do with me.

I am warning dumb faggots that atheism was taking over by jews, who turned it into an anti white, anti science religious cult of jew worship. Look how you repay me.

I'm trying to understand you here, I really am, but you are just so aggressive sounding. I'm willing to give you and chance, perhaps you can explain in more detail what it is that you mean to say.

Starting with what it is you think you are referring to: I think the problem might be that we are using similar words to describe different concepts, could you so me a favor and define: "atheism" for me? I'll go first, to me, it just means "anyone who does not believe in god". I do not intend to refer to any sort of greater commonality between me and others who I consider to be atheists except for the agreement on this one point, for me, it is all you need to fit the definition of the term.

I'd also like to fill you in a bit more about my philosophical positions: I personally describe myself as someone who does not believe in supernatural concepts, of which the monotheistic or polytheistic or deistic versions of "god" are just one (I am a philosophical naturalist with regard to metaphysics).

A more in-depth description of my positions are that I do not believe in what I believe it is not scientifically justified to believe in. I take this position because I believe that it is most important for beliefs to be true and based on fact (because no good word or deed can be undertaken by intent, without a solid foundation of justifiably true beliefs that are held in common among a sufficiently sized group of people), and because I believe that the scientific method is the only viable standard for good epistemology (meaning that I am a scientific positivist).

So, What is atheism to you, and to what are your referring to here? Whatever it is, I am sure that I probably do not belong to that grouping.