I'll look into them.
I don't think the term "right wing" has any particular meaning, since it includes the vast majority of all political positions ever. What are you referring to when you say "right wing honey pot shit."?
Youre correct. The left and right dichotomy is virtually meaningless. I myself wouldve readily identified with "left wing" politics not so long ago but the truth of the matter is were all just one volk with different aspects of self interest, one community. For instance left wing people have the correct opinions when it comes to 'socialism' while "right wingers" have a propensity for pro 'nationalist' agendas. The ends justify the means.
Back to your question, when I said 'right wing honey pot shit' it was an oversimplification. Most of the 'people' i see making posts thatll ill assume for the sake of this discussion aren't comment bots make the assumption that their politics are strictly right wing and therefore correct. So when I say right wing honey pot I meant in the sense that you might think of say Q anon shit. There are not left wing goys falling for Q anon shit. Only right wingers who identify as such. I hope that clarifies my meaning somewhat
Ok, that makes a bit more sense. I'm not sure lefties are less suceptible to ideological traps though: Marxism and especially cultural marxism are massive sinkholes.
As for socialism... I used to be a socialist, I don't think it has much to recommend itself. Beyond the basic idea of taking care of your community (which most people want to do anyway) I haven't seen socialist economists or ethical philosophers produce many ideas worth keeping.
I didnt mean to imply leftists where less suspectible rather that Poal attracts the kind of people who still dont know any better than to take pride in identifying with the 'right winger' jewish tropes on television.
Now putting aside the headier utopian ideals those people tend to imagine and the fact that Karl Marx was in all likelihood descended from a long line of Loxist and Talmudic jews - lets just do a little 'socialism' thought experiment.
We in the United States spend at a minimum (according to the calculations Ive seen by Alternative Hypothesis) a trillion dollars on taking care of niggers in this country. That is socialism. Do you think the core of white America would have a bunch of argueing to do over whether that trillion dollars a year was allocated by someone like yourself in any way they saw fit to benefit whites alone since we are majority of net taxpayers who allow this corruption/socialism/bio-leninism to continue?
My guess would be most whites would just let you do whatever you wanted with that trillion dollars. even if you used it to buy everyone jet skis at least it wouldnt still be supporting the criminal negligence and babysitting of an entire race of miscreants
I dont feel like Ive been concise enough. My concern chiefly is that you not take what I say or frankly what anyone else says on this site for the golden truth. I see a lot of lies passed around. a lot of posts and comments i suspect have either been finklethinked into peoples heads or just originating from glowniggers and bots here on poal. more even than I saw on voat, but probably not as many as I saw on /r/thedonald
We all are probably from very different backgrounds so I dont care most of the time to correct others on their mistaken info. The important thing now is we organize and not get caught up climbing another ladder of jewish tricks.
I used to put a lot of credence into McCarthys work. I used to think the Founding Fathers had the best intentions. Unfortunately nothing could be further from the truth.
(post is archived)