> No friend* we* are the slaves, as our fathers before us and before them. Both are true. >Germany had no master nor would it have had the jews not saw it fit to bring the entire new world order crashing down upon the tiny European country the size of one of our medium sized states. That's blatantly untrue. If Hitler was not the master of his country then there are no masters. >You've imbibed too much Jewish poison regarding national socialism. You should watch The Greatest Story Never Told. Hitler was elected democratically. No. He won a plurality and was appointed as chancellor by the president. >The Germans escaped the great depression and Weimar Germany and entered an immediate golden age. That had already begun to happen before he rose to power >I dont need to see the statistics of public approval or what have you. Ive seen the footage. The look on their faces. The adoration. He wasnt their master, he was their fuhrer (leader). Mincing words > It was a title he earned in blood in soil like no leader of this country has in well over 200 years. The Germans, like us, were jewish slaves for decades before Hitler saved them. And now they had a new ~~master~~ sorry! "fuhrer." Tell me, if they weren't slaves, were they free to ignore his orders? No? Then he was their master. >Stop worrying about capitalism, freedom, and obedience. We are in no position to discuss such trite matters or pretend that we at any point in history had things better than them. America has always been corrupt since its founding because so many of those men also concerned themselves chiefly with matters of 'markets' and 'competition' and 'liberty' and did not heed the will of the people to be free of jewish tyranny even then ringing its hands with anticipation as it sowed the seeds of our destruction. No. Liberty is the chief concern facing european people. Without it we might get a good master occasionally, if we're lucky. The rest of the time we'll be lead to our destruction. The *only* other option to slavery is freedom. >The founding fathers cared nothing for the yewmen. They were concerned with the trading and keeping of their slaves both black and white like pokemon cards. They viciously defended their own power and spoke down to men who fought and died for independence but because they used flowery language about untest ideas born of the "Enlightenment" I don't give a shit about dead politicians. >And yet we no longer live in such a time. The language and the ideals of John Locke and other so called "enlightened philosophers" have been put to the test. Just like Communism. Capitalism . Liberalism. Is apathy. Death. Its a grown man watching my little pony cartoons jekring off all day and going on a shooting spree. Its a small child dancing in a LGBTQPedophile night club strung out on opiotes on a live stream for a fundraiser to bring more rapists, murders, and biological detritus here to live off of the good will of our good people. So has socialism. It's the cancer that grows on dying nations. >You expect that you can speak of these things and that I will entertain them while our women and children continue to be mutilated raped and murdered without consequence as they have for so long. We are living in Weimerica. Comparing our situation to theirs seems almost trivial, what we experience is so much worse and what weve yet to experience is still worse yet, worse than anything the jews have put Europeans through in the past and this time they mean to finish the job but because of honied words about economic theories and this phantasmal desire for abstract concepts like liberalism and coca cola we continue to face our extinction at pace. You seem to be under the impression that your opinion is over much more concern to me than it actually is. You're just a guy on the internet, I couldn't give a shit what you "entertain" or not. >These things are meaningless and your people are not. Hitler taught his people that the institution must work for them and then he gave every single man woman and child a purpose. He put the men to work, he gave every woman back a home to keep and the money to fulfill their duty to their family and take charge in their communities, he taught Germany that nothing was more important than their children, he gave them the Hitler Youth (Boyscouts). He wasn't the worst master in the 20th century, that's the best I can say about him. >He spent and he spent and he spent and It did not matter that there was no money to pay for anything. Before Hitler, Germans were accustome to using wheel barrels of cash to buy a loaf of bread. It didnt matter how much money he printed, just like todays jews Hitler knew the secrets about inflation and how to manipulate the market by putting his thumb on the scale but he did so strictly to help his people and not to help a cadre of his closest confidants get rich quick or drain the country like the vampires. Lmao. You talk like a religious fantatic. His spending had dire consequences for the very recently restored reichmark (restored before he came to power by the way). You can argue if you like that inflating the currency was *necessary*, but arguing it had no consequences is pure fantasy. >When someone was discovered abusing the totalitarian system in place to grease their own palms justice was swift and merciless in Nazi Germany. To steal from ones people was the penultima of crimes, there was no greater dishonor and the price was death. There was plenty of corruption in the party. They enriched themselves plenty at the expense of the German people. >Dont forget it was Mussolini's very definition of National Socialism that the institutions sole purpose was to suite the purpose and needs of its people and he might well know considering he literally wrote the book on NatSoc. Mussolini wrote the book on fascism. They were two separate movements.