WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

133

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

The statement is technically correct in that mathematics is a model, not reality itself. However these lunatics have no interest in such subtlties and just want 2+2=5 so that jamal can pass his exams.

[–] 1 pt

I disagree. Mathematics isn't a model of reality at all, though it can be used to describe it. It's an internally consistent system which is self-objective.

[–] 0 pt

I thought that's what I said, maybe not. It's possible to make internally self consistant models which don't reflect reality at all.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

tl;dr: "Math is too hard for women and niggers, so let's replace math with something simple and useless that a woman or a nigger can do, then pay women and niggers to pretend to be leading mathematicians."

[–] 1 pt

Some women are actually good at math. But niggers? Nope

I cant read more liberal nigger's are just like us but whites oppress them and math is racist stories. I assume the article is all about how math be racist and evil whites are holding the fine black man back.

The actual article title: California promotes 'dismantling racism in mathematics' guidance in draft for statewide framework

What this tell us is that niggers are retarded and have no place in 1st world nations.

I know right, the niggers are simply below modern humans. But the liberals think that it is our fault that they are simply lower on the evolutinaty ladder then modern humans. Sure they can somewhat mimic humans, but they always regress into niggers. If it were simply the color of their skin I would agree that it would be dumb to treat them different.

But its not just the color of their skin, its their brains. Their brains are more primitive and just can not fully be human. It is not our fault they are close to monkeys.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt (edited )

Math is an abstraction, it isn't real. Thus math relies on assumptions, some of which are treated as real for simplicity's sake.

You could say if you have one apple on a plate and you add another, then you have 2 apples. That's functionally and understandably accurate, because we assume all apples are the same, and the space they occupy is their common ground. Now let's use math to tackle something a bit more complex like turbulent boundary layer of an aircraft under yaw, sure 1 + 1 still equals two, and high pressure seeks low pressure, but how do you use that to make a better wing with less drag or more lift? You can't 1 + 1 your way to an answer even if you use a super computer cluster. You just have to test and see what works and what doesn't, and if your design doesn't work it's a very costly mistake involving lives and millions of dollars of plane.

In engineering, the specification is always +/-, there's always a tolerance. Things are considered functional, or serviceable if they fall within certain tolerances, just like the temperature in your body.

[–] 1 pt

Given some starting conditions, it just explores what conclusions come from those. Where those starting conditions match something in reality, the conclusions hold.

[–] 0 pt

In my humble opinion, you are free to believe whatever you want, but start preaching and you got to live it!

These sorry excuses for jesters ought to suffer the consequences of their teachings and just discard living with anything that is associated with the undoubtably true and false in "racist" math..

Good luck with that PC, internet, gps, building, medication, trip to Mars, smartphone, powerplant, car, lathe, chemistry, bridge, reducing CO2 emissions...

[–] 0 pt

Can't wait to see whatever math alternative applied to bridges, machining, medicine, etc...

[–] 1 pt

Math is great to get you in the ballpark, but no bridge is built exactly to spec, it is undoubtedly overengineered, and redundancies are put in place. If you estimate 30 tons worth of load, you make that bridge capable of supporting 75 tons, or you're asking for trouble.

[–] 1 pt

Take your automobile, the manufacturers understand you're a hamfisted moron who has no concept for weight transfer or the friction coefficient of your tires, let alone monitor your tire pressure. They overengineer safety into the car to compensate for your incompetence behind the wheel.