WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

124

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Source?

[–] 2 pts

https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/09/f66/NT-19-1.pdf

Notably nothing is discharged within 12 miles from the shore and any liquid with a .002 rem or less is discharged.

To put .002 rem into perspective you ingest more radiation when you eat a banana. That is why I am asking how hot fukushima water is? Is it 5 rem 10 rem? I am genuinely curious if this is just a sensational article or is it a legitimate concern we should be pissed about

[–] 1 pt

>What is this? You're comparing one million tons of radioactive waste with what here exactly?

<crickets>

I would put one drop of my own piss in your beer you would be willing to fight to NOT drink it

But for some odd reason, you're perfectly fine with one million tons of (highly) radioactive water dumped into fishing areas from where your food is coming from

>But wait, the insanity gets better: Japan's decision to release all this radioactivity into the ocean was backed by none other than the "scientists" at the International Atomic Energy Agency, with Director General Rafael Grossi saying it is "scientifically sound" and in line with standard practice in the nuclear industry around the world.

>So... the IAEA has a standard practice of what exploded nuclear power plants do with their fallout water? And how often has this particular standard practice been invoked we wonder?

[–] 1 pt

I am asking a question of how radioactive or hot the water is and you start to chimp out like a nigger faggot. Do you know where we should out this water?

Your knee jerk reaction faggotry is infantile. You are only embarrassing yourself.

So let me ask you one more time, how radioactive is the water? If you don't know then say so stop acting like a kike

[–] 0 pt

What is this? You're comparing one million tons of radioactive waste with what here exactly?