The US Navy dumps radioactive water into the ocean every day. How radioactive is the water? 5 milirems? 10 rems? How hot is the water?
- Nuclear submarines and shit, nigger. Keep up.
Sorry, but the fag blocked me.
Vague unbacked claims get morons blocked here
You also block people who you can't win arguments against, so it doesn't have that much teeth coming from you.
It’s measured in curie content, not exposure rate. Don’t ask me how I know these things but I can assure you I’m not wrong. Anyway, the navy keeps very accurate records of the amounts and curie content of every gallon of contaminated water that goes overboard. It’s really not as bad as you think. Also, dilution is the solution.
Navy measures in rem and they use sieverts in most other things. The article doesn't give any type of information about the radiation contamination. I am assuming it's alpha particles.
I agree putting it into the ocean is its best chance of removing radiation.
Ok, let me be a little more specific, I was part of that program in the navy for 9 years. The navy measures exposure in Rem/roentgen and contamination in curies. The amount of contamination of discharged water was measured in curie content and of which isotope and half-life. Do not argue with me about this because you will not win.
Source?
https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/09/f66/NT-19-1.pdf
Notably nothing is discharged within 12 miles from the shore and any liquid with a .002 rem or less is discharged.
To put .002 rem into perspective you ingest more radiation when you eat a banana. That is why I am asking how hot fukushima water is? Is it 5 rem 10 rem? I am genuinely curious if this is just a sensational article or is it a legitimate concern we should be pissed about
>What is this? You're comparing one million tons of radioactive waste with what here exactly?
<crickets>
I would put one drop of my own piss in your beer you would be willing to fight to NOT drink it
But for some odd reason, you're perfectly fine with one million tons of (highly) radioactive water dumped into fishing areas from where your food is coming from
>But wait, the insanity gets better: Japan's decision to release all this radioactivity into the ocean was backed by none other than the "scientists" at the International Atomic Energy Agency, with Director General Rafael Grossi saying it is "scientifically sound" and in line with standard practice in the nuclear industry around the world.
>So... the IAEA has a standard practice of what exploded nuclear power plants do with their fallout water? And how often has this particular standard practice been invoked we wonder?
What is this? You're comparing one million tons of radioactive waste with what here exactly?
(post is archived)