WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Fukkkk you dolphin, and fukkk you whaleeeee!

[–] 1 pt

It's okay, the nips will eat those animals and remove the radiation.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Listen....The earth is a lot tougher than we've been told. Mankind cannot cause catastrophic climate change, only the sun and universe can change our planet.

We are nothing compared to the forces at work in the universe. A million tons of radioactive seawater won't even be noticed in a week.

If it is, they are lying to you.

[–] 6 pts (edited )

>A million tons of radioactive seawater won't even be noticed in a week.

Now go fish nearby and eat

Why not?

>Mankind cannot cause catastrophic climate change,

Listen, I get that you're an idiot and got traumatized by the left, I get it

But this, has NOTHING to do with climate change, like nothing at all, oranges and apples

Except for scientists being corporate whores, but that's not news. We all knew they were pieces of shit in college already for the vast majority of them

[–] 1 pt

this guy seems like the monsanto guy who was dumb enough to claim that glypho.. whatever was as safe as water and you could drink it but when asked if he would do it right there point blank said 'im not that stupid' so.... they know what theyre saying.

[–] 0 pt

Dilution is the solution, nigger

[–] 1 pt

drink diluted monsanto shit and get back to me later.

Stop trying to educate people, some of them deserve to get deleted by the next great filter.

[–] 1 pt

radioactive seawater wont even be noticed in a week

literally not how that works.

theres a reason radioactive waste gets buried hundreds of feet under the ground in very special containers with big warning signs on them that you cant go anywhere near for ... in fact longer than we have been able to write. so for something that is 'leeterallee the sayfest type of power on the planet' we sure are making someone else a fucking problem someone further down the line.

but you already knew that didnt you.

[–] 1 pt

It’s because the shit you are talking about (spent fuel, reactor vessel components, various metal parts) are high density, solid waste. Yep, that shit is stored underground. But the water can be diluted and not be a big deal. There is more radiation in a fucking banana than you’d ever believe. There is a ton of naturally occurring nuclides all over the earth. Shit is everywhere. So to take a large volume of water, which won’t have a large contamination level in and of itself, and dilute the shit into the ocean it won’t be a big deal. Learn a little bit about how nuclear reactors work and radiological controls for waste and shit and then come here and yap. You sound like a fucking uneducated nigger ooga boogaing about how your life matters ignorant to the fact that it doesn’t.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

...

pretty sure i mentioned potassium in bananas already.

again, not how that works. youd have to eat that many bananas to get enough potassium to kill you that youd already be dead 10 times over from having too much banana in you.

justify it all you like. youre still pretending dumping radioactive water isnt dangerous.

which is fucking mouth breathing retarded.

as is every other claim that nuclear power is some kind of magical clean power source.

how many fukushimas and chernobyls would you like in your own back yard before ya decide maybe its not so smart...

Brainwashed. Seriously, radiation happens all the time. The earth can take it.

The Earth is tough. We'll be going away soon, though.

remade, not going anywhere yet.

My soon is about 10000 years at least.

Did you know that the Earth alone is 13 billion years old?

[–] 3 pts

the one thing corona has taught me is that more often than not the "scientists" are politicians and have no idea what any of the science they report on actual works

[–] 2 pts

The US Navy dumps radioactive water into the ocean every day. How radioactive is the water? 5 milirems? 10 rems? How hot is the water?

[–] 1 pt
  • Nuclear submarines and shit, nigger. Keep up.

Sorry, but the fag blocked me.

[–] 0 pt

Vague unbacked claims get morons blocked here

[–] 1 pt

You also block people who you can't win arguments against, so it doesn't have that much teeth coming from you.

[–] 0 pt

It’s measured in curie content, not exposure rate. Don’t ask me how I know these things but I can assure you I’m not wrong. Anyway, the navy keeps very accurate records of the amounts and curie content of every gallon of contaminated water that goes overboard. It’s really not as bad as you think. Also, dilution is the solution.

[–] 0 pt

Navy measures in rem and they use sieverts in most other things. The article doesn't give any type of information about the radiation contamination. I am assuming it's alpha particles.

I agree putting it into the ocean is its best chance of removing radiation.

[–] 0 pt

Ok, let me be a little more specific, I was part of that program in the navy for 9 years. The navy measures exposure in Rem/roentgen and contamination in curies. The amount of contamination of discharged water was measured in curie content and of which isotope and half-life. Do not argue with me about this because you will not win.

[–] 0 pt

Source?

[–] 2 pts

https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/09/f66/NT-19-1.pdf

Notably nothing is discharged within 12 miles from the shore and any liquid with a .002 rem or less is discharged.

To put .002 rem into perspective you ingest more radiation when you eat a banana. That is why I am asking how hot fukushima water is? Is it 5 rem 10 rem? I am genuinely curious if this is just a sensational article or is it a legitimate concern we should be pissed about

[–] 1 pt

>What is this? You're comparing one million tons of radioactive waste with what here exactly?

<crickets>

I would put one drop of my own piss in your beer you would be willing to fight to NOT drink it

But for some odd reason, you're perfectly fine with one million tons of (highly) radioactive water dumped into fishing areas from where your food is coming from

>But wait, the insanity gets better: Japan's decision to release all this radioactivity into the ocean was backed by none other than the "scientists" at the International Atomic Energy Agency, with Director General Rafael Grossi saying it is "scientifically sound" and in line with standard practice in the nuclear industry around the world.

>So... the IAEA has a standard practice of what exploded nuclear power plants do with their fallout water? And how often has this particular standard practice been invoked we wonder?

[–] 0 pt

What is this? You're comparing one million tons of radioactive waste with what here exactly?

[–] 2 pts

Haven't they already been dumping radioactive Fukushima water into the Pacific for the past decade?

[–] 5 pts

Of course they have. This just retroactively gives their actions a stamp of approval.

[–] 1 pt

You mean "radioactively" don't you?

[–] 1 pt

Don't notice this tactic to manipulate memory and alter circumstances in the social narrative.

[–] 0 pt

Thank you.

That's what I was looking for - a calm rational answer.

[–] 0 pt

How much, how fast, where and when

Again, what are you talking about?

Again, "source" your claims or shut the fuck up

[–] 2 pts

I simply asked a question.

And I won't ever shut up just because some whiny pissant says so.

[–] 0 pt

You still are talking out of your ass, and you still aren't backing your claims with sources

Why? Rhetorical question.... You're full of shit and it's showing

Now, again, put up or shut up

What is it you don't understand now you moronic piece of shit?

[–] 0 pt

Well let's just look that right up. I'm sure the government of Japan has made all of those numbers public for us to examine.

[–] 1 pt

not sure which one of them fucks you harder...

...but the scientist is probably enjoying it more

[–] 1 pt

jews did this to them.

[–] 0 pt

Radioactive is a fancy way of saying “warm water”.

Nuclear power plants are nothing more than glorified steam generators. That’s all it is

[–] 0 pt

You're retarded

We're talking about fucking nuclear waste you idiot, not just warm water

[–] 0 pt

It’s just warm water. That’s all it is. Uranium waste is fake. It’s just rocks that emit heat aka radiation. It won’t kill you

[–] 0 pt

Of course shithead, how about depleted uranium for breakfast? Why not???

Now shut the fuck up shitstain, end of stupid debate

[–] 0 pt

So what were the alternative options? Pack it all up and store it deep underground? I’m guessing they decided the alternatives were too expensive.

[–] 0 pt

Just in case that faggot OP wants to show up again.

It is good that Japan will release water from Fukushima Have you noticed that the Fukushima water theme returns to the headlines every few months? Various newspapers publish clickbait articles that "Japan will spill contaminated radioactive water, millions of liters of radioactive waste will end up in the ocean, and life in the Pacific is at risk." Is it really? Is this water contaminated? No. The water was purified by ALPS (Advanced Liquid Processing System) and tested for various radioactive isotopes such as cesium-137, cesium-134, cobalt-60, antimony-125, ruthenium-106, iodine-129, tritium, technetium-99, carbon-14 and many others. Heavy metals have been filtered out and their concentration does not exceed the standards. Each water tank has been thoroughly tested and water will be released only from those tanks that have passed all the tests. https://www4.tepco.co.jp/en/sp/decommission/progress/watertreatment/images/tankarea_en.pdf What about tritium? Water contains some tritium, which is an isotope of hydrogen. It cannot be filtered out. Therefore, the water will be diluted to an activity of 1500 Bq/l, which is 40 times less than the Japanese safety standards and 7 times less than the drinking water guidelines of the World Health Organization. Tritium radiation is very weak. Its decay energy is 0.019 MeV. For comparison, the decay energy of naturally occurring radioactive gas radon-222 is 5.59 MeV, and the fission energy of the uranium-235 nucleus is as much as 200 MeV. It is an interesting fact that tritium is a renewable isotope. Every day, tritium atoms are formed in the upper atmosphere. This has been happening for millions of years as a result of the action of a huge fusion reactor called the sun. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radon https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Japan-to-discharge-treated-Fukushima-Daiichi-water Is tritium dangerous? Tritium is so safe that you can buy it on eBay. If you do not believe it, type "tritium" in the search engine, it will show various luminous key rings, watches with luminous digits, and even a tritium-powered flashlight. These items can be purchased without any permissions. If tritium was as dangerous as anti-atomic fear spreaders claim, we should already have a nuclear armageddon, and the owners of tritium key rings should be dying of radiation sickness. However, this doesn’t happen. https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=tritium How much tritium is in the water from Fukushima? There are 16g (0.5 oz) of tritium in 1,180,000 m³ (312,000,000 US gallons) of water - only sixteen grams of tritium per billion liters of water! https://www.meti.go.jp/english/earthquake/nuclear/decommissioning/pdf/20191227_2.pdf (page 3) What about carbon-14? News about “deadly” carbon-14 began to appear in the newspapers after Greenpeace published its report on the allegedly dangerous content of this isotope in Fukushima water that “could damage human DNA”. However, the report lacks details. It doesn't even say how much of that carbon-14 is there! In response to Greenpeace's allegations, TEPCO spokesman Ryounosuke Takanori reports that there are between 2 and 220 Bq/l in the water. Takanori has calculated that if someone drank 2 liters of Fukushima water all year round, one would take the dose of max 110 uSv. For comparison, a person in Europe takes a dose of about 0.10-0.15 uSv every hour, and an average of 2,500 uSv per year - this dose comes from natural sources. The Greenpeace publication appears to be a classic example of the anti-nuclear rhetoric of fear, written to influence the emotions of people without specialist knowledge of radiation and to create media sensation. https://storage.googleapis.com/planet4-japan-stateless/2020/10/5768c541-the-reality-of-the-fukushima-radioactive-water-crisis_en_summary.pdf https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/24/asia/japan-fukushima-waste-ocean-intl-scli/index.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_radiation Has anyone already drunk Fukushima water? Yes. During a press conference in 2011, Yasuhiro Sonoda drank Fukushima's water in front of photojournalists. Yasuhiro Sonoda is still alive and well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rPnkWiyBH0 Is the water in the ocean radioactive? Yes. Various elements, including radioactive ones, are diluted in ordinary water. In seawater, quite naturally, there are 4 billion tons of uranium. Remember this when you bathe in the sea! Various methods of extracting uranium from water are currently being tested, and in the future such a method may become an alternative to extracting uranium from the ground. It should also be remembered that radioactive radon-222 is dissolved in water. Water from a well, especially in mountainous regions, may contain such an amount of radon that it is noticeable with an amateur dosimeter. Despite this, no one claims that seawater or well water is radioactive waste. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2016/07/01/uranium-seawater-extraction-makes-nuclear-power-completely-renewable/?sh=13272590159a https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149197017300914 Do I eat and drink radioactive isotopes every day? Yes, and it is not a failure or leak, it is completely natural. In addition, some of these isotopes are renewable, and new atoms are constantly being created to complement the self-decaying atoms. The following are examples of the different things that radioactive isotopes contain: coffee - potassium-40 banana - potassium-40 potatoes, chips - potassium-40 all plants - carbon-14 seawater - uranium-235 and uranium-238 air - tritium, carbon-14, radon-222 granite, building materials - thorium-232 welding electrodes - cerium-136/138/140 and thorium-232 smoke detectors - americium-241 What are international organizations saying about this? The International Atomic Energy Agency sees no reason to pour water out into the ocean. Mariano Grossi, IAEA Director: Today's decision by the Government of Japan is a milestone that will help pave the way for continued progress in the decommissioning of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Tanks with the water occupy large areas of the site, and water management, including the disposal of the treated water in a safe and transparent manner involving all stakeholders, is of key importance for the sustainability of these decommissioning activities. The Japanese government's decision is in line with practice globally, even though the large amount of water at the Fukushima plant makes it a unique and complex case. The United States also sees no contraindications: Japan appears to have adopted an approach in accordance with globally accepted nuclear safety standards in its decision to release water contaminated at the wrecked Fukushima atomic power station following treatment. The panel of experts assessing the water in 2020 stated: Gallon of this water is as radioactive as a bag of potato chips.

https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Japan-to-discharge-treated-Fukushima-Daiichi-water https://www.reuters.com/article/us-disaster-fukushima-usa-idUSKBN2C004C https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2020/02/01/japans-expert-panel-agrees-that-dumping-radioactive-water-into-the-ocean-is-best/?sh=423fb9fd200c Is it good that Japan will pour out this water? Yes. It poses no threat. The demands of anti-nuclear organizations to pick out all radioactive atoms from this water is unrealistic to meet, and above all - pointless. Currently, this water is cleaner than any ordinary river. There is no scientific rationale for keeping this water indefinitely. There is no point in further purifying. Calling this water "contaminated" or "radioactive waste" is manipulation. Pouring it into the ocean is the right solution. The best way to fight the anti-nuclear rhetoric of fear is education.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

>Radiotactive water straight out of a crippled nuclear power plant with a melted uranium core

>Supposedly threated by the same bunch who lied all the way since day1. MSM confirms, it's safe; mankind finally came up with the instant nuclear waste filter! 1 million tons in 3 years! 1000 tons a day! That's right! And it's cheap!

>Now it's called "safe radioactive water" by morons like the one above.

Tell me again how 1 million tons of water laced with nuclear waste straight out of a crippled nuclear power plant with the uranium core that melted through its fucking reactor is anything but a fucking big deal

Just say it again you fucking moron

It's not just hot water you shit for brain

>Japan appears to have adopted an approach in accordance with globally accepted nuclear safety standards in its decision to release water contaminated at the wrecked Fukushima atomic power station following treatment.

The joke!

"globally accepted nuclear safety standards for crippled nuclear power plants and melted uranium cores ™" (aka dump everything in the ocean and call it a day)

As if this was a fucking thing to begin with, gtfo

[–] 0 pt

Based Japs are making radioactive Kaiju since they know Pedo Joe won’t protect them

Load more (2 replies)