The development of tactical Neutron Bombs was done with the explicit intent of leaving infrastructure unaffected or as a "area denial" weapon. I only was responding to your comment that "destroying infrastructure is oldschool" implying that Nuclear weapons would not be used do to the widespread destruction of existing infrastructure. That assumption is incorrect.
All of that aside. I tend to agree with you that chemical and biological weapons will be the weapons of choice both due to the negative stigma associated with nuclear weapons and the nature of the modern 6th generation WW3 cold war battlefield.
The development of tactical Neutron Bombs was done with the explicit intent of leaving infrastructure unaffected or as a "area denial" weapon. I only was responding to your comment that "destroying infrastructure is oldschool" implying that Nuclear weapons would not be used do to the widespread destruction of existing infrastructure. That assumption is incorrect.
All of that aside. I tend to agree with you that chemical and biological weapons will be the weapons of choice both due to the negative stigma associated with nuclear weapons and the nature of the modern 6th generation WW3 cold war battlefield.
(post is archived)