Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

620

Funny I read this in the daily mail today. Some black owned waterfront property that was made a city park was given back to the original owners family because the way it was taken wasnt right. So if that's really the case then give it back to the real owners who are native american not a family who bought it in 1912.

Funny I read this in the daily mail today. Some black owned waterfront property that was made a city park was given back to the original owners family because the way it was taken wasnt right. So if that's really the case then give it back to the real owners who are native american not a family who bought it in 1912.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 0 pt

Prove the fucking indian savages "owned" this land, do they have any documentation or a deed or other proof of "ownership"?

So if you go on vacation and a family of indians take up residence on your property and in your house, is it still your property or did the "original owners", with no proof of ownership whatsoever, take it "back" from you?

Being a SQUATTER isn't proof of ownership.

[–] • 0 pt

Im sure there's some pictographs with the land deed on it it was notarized with some local tree sap.