Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

Funny I read this in the daily mail today. Some black owned waterfront property that was made a city park was given back to the original owners family because the way it was taken wasnt right. So if that's really the case then give it back to the real owners who are native american not a family who bought it in 1912.

Funny I read this in the daily mail today. Some black owned waterfront property that was made a city park was given back to the original owners family because the way it was taken wasnt right. So if that's really the case then give it back to the real owners who are native american not a family who bought it in 1912.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

When california gives all their land back to native Americans, will the indians cull all the spics and niggers?

[–] • 0 pt

It they were smart they would lease it to them.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes,they'll make great Tee-pee,shelters.

[–] • 0 pt

Perhaps. The Natives do have a prior claim over the imports.

[–] • 0 pt

The natives won't sell it to jews for some new jordans and an xbox

[–] • 0 pt

FUCK THE NIGGERS AND FUCK THE INDIANS....TEEPEE RATS AND MUD MONKEYS ARE GOOD FOR SHIT.

[–] • 0 pt

Black people now constantly claim that eminent domain is racist. There is a MARTA station (the thing that moves Africans rapidly through Atlanta) that was supposedly built on a "good" black neighborhood. They are now bitching that the building of it was racist. They also point out without any hint of irony that all of Buckhead's (a rich area's) black ghettoes were bulldozed some time ago. Really gets the noggin joggin.

[–] • 0 pt

I don't think you're considered a real owner if a nation lays claim to your shit and you can't defend it

It's not a nice thing to happen, but that's how it works

[–] • 0 pt

Good point. The indians for the most part hated each other and traitors their kind all the way to the end.

[–] • 0 pt

Prove the fucking indian savages "owned" this land, do they have any documentation or a deed or other proof of "ownership"?

So if you go on vacation and a family of indians take up residence on your property and in your house, is it still your property or did the "original owners", with no proof of ownership whatsoever, take it "back" from you?

Being a SQUATTER isn't proof of ownership.

[–] • 0 pt

Im sure there's some pictographs with the land deed on it it was notarized with some local tree sap.