My apologies. I thought that was a rhetorical question!
I’ve never considered myself a bigot. To which worldview am I unreasonably attached?
I would have no way of knowing "To which worldview" you are "unreasonably attached". You may not be a bigot, but why the negativity towards Candace Owens?
I have no negative or positive feelings towards her. I simply don’t care. I have no dog in this fight.
I have a standard procedure that I go through when I see anyone being promoted in the media. The first step is to look at their university accomplishments, and especially to read any papers that they have published. The second step, if they do not come from a wealthy family, is to look into if and how they have acquired any wealth.
I suspect that you are in fact the one that is unreasonably attached to a belief system having to do with this woman. Interestingly enough this makes you, by definition, the bigot that you accused me of being.
I know you were taught that everyone online is trying to push their “narrative“ on you, but some are some of us really just don’t care and are here for the bantz. I do generally endorse Third Position politics and Monarchies though, if you’re really interested in my politics.
I'm interested in your politics, and I'll ignore the attempt at point scoring by just simply pointing out what you've said isn't true, and moving forward.
I'm not attached to Owens, and the "narrative" comment is immaturely is eye rolling.
With that said, I agree that a part of her success is filling that 'niche' in political commentary.... black, assertive, intelligent woman, yadda yadda. None of that takes away from what she's doing, which is very positive. I've had much success sending her videos to blacks and having some discourse with them, over her, since, you know... she's black. So just because she's successful, based on an entertainment formula, how does that take away from anything? All success is based on one formula, or another.
(post is archived)