WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

When he went to the emergency room, doctors determined that he had experienced an adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine, WRIC reported. “We ruled out all the viral infections, we ruled out COVID-19 itself, we made sure that his kidneys and liver was okay, and finally we came to the conclusion that it was the vaccine that he had received that was the cause,” said Dr. Fnu Nutan, who noted that if Terrell had not been treated, the condition could have been deadly.

When he went to the emergency room, doctors determined that he had experienced an adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine, WRIC reported. “We ruled out all the viral infections, we ruled out COVID-19 itself, we made sure that his kidneys and liver was okay, and finally we came to the conclusion that it was the vaccine that he had received that was the cause,” said Dr. Fnu Nutan, who noted that if Terrell had not been treated, the condition could have been deadly.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Are you fucking kidding me? Do you think I wrote this shit? I hope your rant is directed at the author of this shit. They were forced to admit that they nearly killed a man with there shit.

This "vaccine" will have serious life long consequences to anyone who takes it whether they have an immediate reaction or not. Consequences that can never be undone. It's not a vaccine at all.

[–] 1 pt

You're a bit retarded aren't ya?

[–] 0 pt

Oh, for sure and you're clearly a genius.

[–] 1 pt

Well, I'm smart enough to see you don't wish to own up that you mistook an obvious comment on the article you posted as being a personal attack against you. An obvious mistake that, if initially admitted too being a reading comprehension failure caused by blinding anger, would make you seem less like the unreasonable psychopath trying to deflect that you are.

Sense I am SUCH a GENIUS by your standards, let me simplify that.

You fucked up, Faggot, and we all see it. Don't deflect on others and pretend you didn't.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Are you kidding me? I directly quoted the person who made that statement in the article and then commented about their quote while addressing the author of it as being a female doctor who is lying to her patients. Where in my comment did I mention anything about you or direct any portion of it toward you?

The only way you could mistake my comment as being directed at you is if you are also a female doctor who is lying to her patients in order to get them to take the "vaccine" and you mistakenly thought I was referring to you instead of the female doctor who is lying to her patients in order to get them to take the "vaccine" from the article.

Are you against people making negative remarks about doctors pushing a (((vaccine)))? Because it appears that you are against negative remarks being made about doctors pushing a (((vaccine))) as you referenced my short comment as being a "rant". Referring to my comment in such a way implies that you viewed the contents of my comment negatively and disapprove of my calling this doctor pushing (((vaccines))) out as being a murderer.

[–] 0 pt

Fair enough.