While I hate the product, they should have the right to do this free from Nike's interference. They took the original shoes (which they owned), modified them, then chose to sell them. How is this different from buying an arbitrary piece of clothing, tearing it/whatever to modify it, then reselling it? Are you obligated to remove their logo?
While I hate the product, they should have the right to do this free from Nike's interference. They took the original shoes (which they owned), modified them, then chose to sell them. How is this different from buying an arbitrary piece of clothing, tearing it/whatever to modify it, then reselling it? Are you obligated to remove their logo?
Because it affects Nike reputation, clearly. Why not make his own.. why Nike shoes? Why not adidas? Or converse, or Nas shoes?
Because it affects Nike reputation, clearly.
Why not make his own.. why Nike shoes?
Why not adidas? Or converse, or Nas shoes?
(post is archived)