[+] [deleted] • 0 pt [deleted by user] link [–] • 2 pts No he's not. That's not the work of a madman, it's agit-prop. No he's not. That's not the work of a madman, it's agit-prop. parent link
[–] • 2 pts No he's not. That's not the work of a madman, it's agit-prop. No he's not. That's not the work of a madman, it's agit-prop. parent link
(post is archived)