toxic masculinity is toxic
toxic masculinity is toxic
The More Pinocchio Lies
The
More
Pinocchio
Lies
Is she jewish? She has no idea how chivalry works.
Chivalry is the natural consequence of a monogamous culture.
In a strictly monogamous regime, males strike a bargain with each other to never take more than one female as a mate. Because of this bargain lower status males are not competing for a scarcity of females while a single male with higher agression or wealth hoards more than his share.
The consequence of this is that highly agressive or greedy males are not as reproductively successful as they are in polygamist societies. Sexually agressive “rapey” males are not tolerated. Males begin to compete based on their accomplishments and their “personality” for high value females. Not surprisingly females like males who treat them nicely. Males with only one mate and a small number of children are also much more likely to give more to each of those. K strategy.
Nice guys == monogamists== chivalry
Maybe there is a bit of a soy cuck tendency in monogamist males (i.e. Whites) that is behind the phenomenon of SJW in some whites.
We are talking about a genetic tendency to be “the better man” and to not escalate violence. To let women have their way.
Maybe a few generations of polygamy will cause white men to be more agressive and problem solved?
I like monogamy and chivalry because I like nice guys. But everyone has to follow the rules or it never works.
Black guys fuck and make babies and then fuck off to prison or whatever. White guys chivalrously pay taxes to feed their polygamous babies. Its got to stop. Monogamists cannot support polygamists anymore.
Is she jewish? She has no idea how chivalry works.
Chivalry is the natural consequence of a monogamous culture.
In a strictly monogamous regime, males strike a bargain with each other to never take more than one female as a mate. Because of this bargain lower status males are not competing for a scarcity of females while a single male with higher agression or wealth hoards more than his share.
The consequence of this is that highly agressive or greedy males are not as reproductively successful as they are in polygamist societies. Sexually agressive “rapey” males are not tolerated. Males begin to compete based on their accomplishments and their “personality” for high value females. Not surprisingly females like males who treat them nicely. Males with only one mate and a small number of children are also much more likely to give more to each of those. K strategy.
Nice guys == monogamists== chivalry
Maybe there is a bit of a soy cuck tendency in monogamist males (i.e. Whites) that is behind the phenomenon of SJW in some whites.
We are talking about a genetic tendency to be “the better man” and to not escalate violence. To let women have their way.
Maybe a few generations of polygamy will cause white men to be more agressive and problem solved?
I like monogamy and chivalry because I like nice guys. But everyone has to follow the rules or it never works.
Black guys fuck and make babies and then fuck off to prison or whatever. White guys chivalrously pay taxes to feed their polygamous babies. Its got to stop. Monogamists cannot support polygamists anymore.
You should write for the conversation. It would be a much better news outlet.
You should write for the conversation. It would be a much better news outlet.
Gee thanks. Ive been reading about monogamy and polygamy and the downstream genetic (behavioral) consequences of each strategy.
It really explains alot of behavior in both muslims and blacks. I tend to view a lot of political shit through an evolutionary lens. So its always popping up in my responses toward seemly unrelated stuff.
No surprise that a lit professor with a focus on medieval english lit misses the boat entirely and tries to make it about feminists and BLM protesters. Nice guys are bred through monogamy. Progressives are literally choosing rape culture over non-rape culture.
Gee thanks. Ive been reading about monogamy and polygamy and the downstream genetic (behavioral) consequences of each strategy.
It really explains alot of behavior in both muslims and blacks. I tend to view a lot of political shit through an evolutionary lens. So its always popping up in my responses toward seemly unrelated stuff.
No surprise that a lit professor with a focus on medieval english lit misses the boat entirely and tries to make it about feminists and BLM protesters. Nice guys are *bred* through monogamy. Progressives are literally choosing rape culture over non-rape culture.
(post is archived)