"Mr. Kennedy is an anti-vaccine activist and a conspiracy theorist.". Gee that sounds defamatory, doesn't it?.
The author would have to prove Kennedy is against all vax, and that it isn't actually a conspiracy perpetuated by multiple entities.
If only 99% are doing it, could any logical and reasonable conclusion be reached?
*"Mr. Kennedy is an anti-vaccine activist and a conspiracy theorist.".* Gee that sounds defamatory, doesn't it?.
The author would have to prove Kennedy is against all vax, and that it isn't actually a conspiracy perpetuated by multiple entities.
If only 99% are doing it, could any logical and reasonable conclusion be reached?
It doesn't matter. The speaker doesn't have an effect on the objective truth of a statement. It's a logical impossibility. Otherwise, a statement could be true when uttered by one individual and the very same statement could then be false when said by another.
It doesn't matter. The speaker doesn't have an effect on the objective truth of a statement. It's a logical impossibility. Otherwise, a statement could be true when uttered by one individual and the very same statement could then be false when said by another.
(post is archived)