Having a ToS and deleting comments and banning people from their property for breaking their rules doesn't invalidate protections from civil liabilty for unsolicited content posted by 3rd parties.
That suggestion is not only retarded, but has been rejected dozens of times now by courts all over the country.
Having a ToS and deleting comments and banning people from their property for breaking their rules doesn't invalidate protections from civil liabilty for unsolicited content posted by 3rd parties.
That suggestion is not only retarded, but has been rejected dozens of times now by courts all over the country.
(post is archived)