Yes, it is not explained why they didn’t take it down after the mom and victim reported it.
Only after homeland security got involved then they took it down. They done fucked up, and now we all know it.
Yes, it is not explained why they didn’t take it down after the mom and victim reported it.
Only after homeland security got involved then they took it down. They done fucked up, and now we all know it.
I'm guessing it's something that's handed off to poorly paid interns. So the kid filed a complaint, intern looked at it briefly and said no.
Then the feds write them a strongly worded letter with the world "childporn" in it and they took it more seriously.
I'm guessing it's something that's handed off to poorly paid interns. So the kid filed a complaint, intern looked at it briefly and said no.
Then the feds write them a strongly worded letter with the world "childporn" in it and they took it more seriously.
The question remains will the leftist-infested courts rule against Jackie Dorsey....one of the Fifth Column's biggest and best 'useful idiots', and if they miraculously do, how will they dilute the ruling sufficiently to limit damage to Twatter?
The question remains will the leftist-infested courts rule against Jackie Dorsey....one of the Fifth Column's biggest and best 'useful idiots', and if they miraculously do, how will they dilute the ruling sufficiently to limit damage to Twatter?
(post is archived)