> *literal child-porn*
asleep.jpg
> "I think we should be a little cautious about these new types of gene-altering shots that didn't exist before, and have never been teste—
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.gif
Don't you dare call Pelosi a drunk commi jew on the platform though thats hate speech.
I bet you would get perma-banned, before even hitting the submit button, just by typing "jews killed Christ."
Bull fucking shit. The law they're quoting explicitly requires the platform remove material illegal on a federal level. And they only have immunity from civil prosecution if they act in good faith.
Live by 230, die by 230. Once they started censoring speech they didnt like, they became publishers...not able to avail themselves of 230s sweet, sweet, juicy exemptipns to defamation, erc
Biden will get right on that
I think we're dependent on various Governors for that legal action.
Having a ToS and deleting comments and banning people from their property for breaking their rules doesn't invalidate protections from civil liabilty for unsolicited content posted by 3rd parties.
That suggestion is not only retarded, but has been rejected dozens of times now by courts all over the country.
"Oy vey, I don't know what's so hard for you stupid fucking goyim to understand! We're a platform when it benefits us and we don't want to police all the kiddie-diddlers we enable, but we're a publisher when we want to erase wrongthink! How is that so hard to figure out! Now drink your soy, eat your bugs, and get back in your pod, goyim!"
Seems like a lose lose for them. I don't want to use a website that has immunity from child porn laws. Who does? Pedophiles of course.
It's Not a lose for them though! The general public, the people that use twatter, will never hear about this! The "media" will circle the wagons and keep this hush hush. If, by chance, word of this does get out you can be assured that they will All have the same spin on the story to make the victims appear to be monsters while trying to make twatter the victim!
How very jewish.
The minor can sue the person who posted the video.
The minor's lawyer needs to make different clams.
(post is archived)