Bush appointee Chief Justice Roberts offers sole dissent in recent free speech case, stating that having your right to speak squashed does not create 'actual damages nor the prospect of future injury.'

[–] • 6 pts

This freaking guy...

When even the liberals on the court, and I'm shocked they sided with Thomas and the moderates as well, side in an almost unanimous opinion on the damages to violations of free speech rights... AND THIS FAGGOT THINKS THERE'S NO ISSUE.

I don't know what his full history has looked like, but I am really disappointed that anyone would say this man is centrist or moderate. He has sided outside constitutional precedent and clearly votes along lines that are more akin to political donor talking points.

link

[–] • 6 pts

He's Bush era appointee and apparently they have dirt on him doodling little boys.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

The face of a pedophile...

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

liberals

different than moderates

You really don't understand what's going on do you?

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

Someone must be blackmailing him.

link

[–] • 2 pts

(edited )

That's precedent for allowing what they term hate speech ain't it?

Because by his logic marginalizing someone, which is the same as censoring someone does not create actual damage or prospect of future injury.

link

[–] • 1 pt

Roberts has that look of a faggot. I'm sure the left has dirt on him, even though being a faggot doesn't have the stigma it use to, they much have video of him and little boys. Nothing make a pedo align with Satan like a pedo video.