That study is written in su h a confusing and biased manner it eould never pass peer review. It states "Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period" in the results yet concludesmasks work. What a piece of shit

CDC: Face masks don't prevent fake virus.

LOL One America Jew Network. Get out of here.

Yeah no kidding, asians have been wearing fask masks during flu season for the longest time and yet that was never recommended to other countries during flu season. It is almost like they have always known that viruses and bacteria are different.

Thier own studies from 2015 told them this already.

In fact, previous CDC studies proved that cloth face masks, even when worn by doctors, increases disease infection rates.

Link: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

The fact that they are saying anything to the contrary now only further proves that the CDC is as politically biased as the FBI, and as such no longer works with public / societal benefit as a goal.

It's time to add that shit organization to the chopping block as well.

Lol which con virus

No shit nigger. That's what people who had a clue about how to contract a virus said right away.

Here is the meat directly from the study with the fat trimmed.

>During March 1–December 31, 2020, state-issued mask mandates applied in 2,313 (73.6%) of the 3,142 U.S. counties. Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all) (Table 1) (Figure). Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease (p = 0.03) in daily COVID-19 death growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.9 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all). Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.

>During the study period, states allowed restaurants to reopen for on-premises dining in 3,076 (97.9%) U.S. counties. Changes in daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates were not statistically significant 1–20 and 21–40 days after restrictions were lifted. Allowing on-premises dining at restaurants was associated with 0.9 (p = 0.02), 1.2 (p<0.01), and 1.1 (p = 0.04) percentage point increases in the case growth rate 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after restrictions were lifted (Table 2) (Figure). Allowing on-premises dining at restaurants was associated with 2.2 and 3.0 percentage point increases in the death growth rate 61–80 and 81–100 days, respectively, after restrictions were lifted (p<0.01 for both). Daily death growth rates before restrictions were lifted were not statistically different from those during the reference period, whereas significant differences in daily case growth rates were observed 41–60 days before restrictions were lifted.

So...

>Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.

But...

>Mask mandates and restricting any on-premises dining at restaurants can help limit community transmission of COVID-19 and reduce case and death growth rates. These findings can inform public policies to reduce community spread of COVID-19.

They technically are not lying in the summery, it helps limit spread. They just leave out that it's negligible.

How to contract a virus, hang a piece of fabric in front of your mouth and breathe through it. The bacteria on your hands, under your fingernails, and smudged on your ass-crack will find it's way into your lungs.