In 2015, for example, Colorado cops blew up a man’s home while trying to get to an armed shoplifting suspect. More than four years later, a federal appeals court decided the property owner wasn't entitled to compensation to cover the wreckage, since police were preserving public safety
Pretty fucked up. This lady is probably screwed as well.
So the state can literally destroy your home and you can't do anything about it.
Not legally. But this is why Killdozers get built.
I doubt any of you will encounter this problem but if you do, you contact your local DA Victim Witness program, they pay you out of the state fund to fix it, then the State sues the criminal who caused the expense. This lady does have legal remedies, she just has to go talk to the DA's office.
Niemeier was an asshole, and accomplished exactly nothing.
I wish I could see if you were the same user who posted comments on this thread about Marvin. https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/297315/
I bet you are part of the good old boys club.
Confused commie degenerate faggot
I'll take "How do you create a radical with nothing to lose?" for $500.
qualified immunity
So the state can literally destroy your home and you can't do anything about it.
In this case it's perfectly justified, although I think there should be some community provision for compensation if this happens. It's in everyone's interest for dangerous criminals to be neutralised and hostages to be protected, property be damned.
The shoplifter one is a bit sketchier.
Yeah, I could agree to such tactics for a hostage situation or something similar, but even then, if the state destroys your property, no matter the reason, they should cover the cost.
I'd say the criminal should cover the cost as part of their terms of release (assuming the cops don't use excessive force).
In this case it's perfectly justified,
Only if you are a retard with explosives and heavy trucks. "When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail." SWAT is the football team of the police force. They make other cops look like Rhodes scholars.
The reality is that a brighter group of people could have the finesse to do the same thing without wanton destruction. Even beyond the property damage, I'm sure that poor hostage will have permanent hearing loss from the beach. There are numerous of stories of babies and small children being burned, blinded, deafened by SWAT raids. Those SWAT boys just don'e care how much damage to people and property that they do.
But, at the end of the day: it's easier to give a bunch of retards big toys and explosives than it is to train hostage negotiators and higher IQ people to have some finesse in situations like this.
They make other cops look like Rhodes scholars.
They put the "Special" in "Special Weapons And Tactics."
I can care less about the hostages, they'd be pretty much fucked from the start, but at least try to minimize property damage.
Blinding and deafening a dog is not ok. Shoot the nigger instead.
Sure you can. You find get the names and addresses of every officer involved and burn their houses down while they're inside with their families. As long as you get the pets out first.
Break a window in a federal building and it is 20yrs to life.
Not if you identify as a faggot antifa member.
(post is archived)