Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

That they need to get into everyone's bodies by October. What's the agenda behind this? Why do I get blank stares when I say contracting covid has a 99% recovery rate? And these vaccines have an efficacy rate of 94% at best with no guarantee that it'll actually work and no recourse if it causes adverse health effects. I'd rather catch covid recover and have natural antibodies that my body will recognize when it comes into contact with the next "varient".

That they need to get into everyone's bodies by October. What's the agenda behind this? Why do I get blank stares when I say contracting covid has a 99% recovery rate? And these vaccines have an efficacy rate of 94% at best with no guarantee that it'll actually work and no recourse if it causes adverse health effects. I'd rather catch covid recover and have natural antibodies that my body will recognize when it comes into contact with the next "varient".

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (33).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

flu vaccine is typically about 70%

Stopped reading when you said this complete nonsense. Flu vax efficacy is at best 50% when using contrived data. In other words, CDC's own data, if you read it instead of 2nd source summaries, show the flu vaccine may at best be 50% and is absolutely never higher. This is based on unscientific evidence at one hospital. The results don't prove 50% efficacy any better than 0%. So, take your best guess... flu vac is between 0 and 50% they don't know and don't want to know.

The study lends itself to misquoting 50% efficacy in media reports and the sheep are too stupid to read it directly. CDC says the vax is not higher than 50%, that is all.

[–] • 0 pt

Flu vaccines typically contain multiple inoculations for different types of influenza and often backfire causing a mild flu they are so damned temperamental and inconsistent that I don't recommend them; typically though the type A component is highly successful.

I could expand on all that and what you said, spend an hour hunting sources down on my phone OR tap out one sentence summing up that they are inferior even from an optimistic perspective as an example of how defeating a virus might look.

You are splitting hairs and making mountains out of molehills.

[–] • -1 pt

Rather I could quote endless results from my FDA submissions throughout my vast years of experience but wont because I know more than you and you are a distraction not worth the time. I win.