That may involve some damage to individual rights, but not all damage is prohibited if it is well-balanced and legitimate in order to achieve a worthy goal,” she said. “It’s your choice,” she added of leisure activities. “If you are vaccinated, you can enter. As long as you aren’t, we can’t let you endanger others.”
Maybe it's technically a choice, but it's not a free choice, it's coerced.
>That may involve some damage to individual rights, but not all damage is prohibited if it is well-balanced and legitimate in order to achieve a worthy goal,” she said. “It’s your choice,” she added of leisure activities. “If you are vaccinated, you can enter. As long as you aren’t, we can’t let you endanger others.”
Maybe it's technically a choice, but it's not a free choice, it's coerced.
For the most part, people neither needed to be coerced into taking previous vaccines, nor was some <strike>mark of the beast</strike> green passport required to differentiate people in order to achieve public health goals. The difference is that COVID is barely dangerous and that the agenda has nothing to do with public health
For the most part, people neither needed to be coerced into taking previous vaccines, nor was some <strike>mark of the beast</strike> green passport required to differentiate people in order to achieve public health goals. The difference is that COVID is barely dangerous and that the agenda has nothing to do with public health
(post is archived)