WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

496

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

yeah...

This is a controlled carrot-on a stick.

that was the point of the judicial action

I see where you are coming from, but you kind of contradicted yourself. Anyway, in the same way you and I know jewgle tracks everything it is through our intuition and general correctly guided mistrust of the complete pieces of shit--I mean, do you think the NSA really stopped tracking everything after Snowden?

The horse doesn't know it can't get the carrot, just like the normie thinks google isn't tracking their every move in every way possible--a trusting naive tech-un-savvy person may very well think that incognito means toward google servers and not merely their own browser history. The judge has an argument--and no doubt google would be inclined to like being able to track people who think they are not being tracked (genuine, unaltered, data collection).

Google is easily one of the greatest evils of our time, and people will come to realize it [though I doubt that juggernaut will be deterred in the slightest by any legal action prior to a major change.

raising awareness to them, and not letting it get memory-holed, are good to see in any way possible--it is just sad to see how accepted and normalized the population has allowed this to become.

you mark my words: google is pure evil.