FBI- entraps white people in their fake drug and terrorism plots.
Also FBI- white people are the greatest terrorist threat.
FBI- entraps white people in their fake drug and terrorism plots.
Also FBI- white people are the greatest terrorist threat.
https://www.abc4.com/news/national/man-gets-nearly-20-years-for-colorado-synagogue-bomb-plot/
Feb 26, 2021: "Holzer’s defense team argued that his suffering of fetal alcohol syndrome influenced his development into adulthood and contributed to his “unmet and overwhelming need to seem more important than he is.”
"The birth defects resulting from Fetal Alcohol Syndrome are caused by alcohol crossing the placenta to the fetus. Some of the affects of alcohol on the fetus are stunted growth and weight, a damaged central nervous system, including impaired brain functioning, and deformities of the head and face. Children can be born with an addiction to alcohol, mental health problems, behavioral problems, attention deficit disorder,learning disabilities, poor memory, heart abnormalities, and brain damage, including mental retardation."
https://www.abc4.com/news/national/man-gets-nearly-20-years-for-colorado-synagogue-bomb-plot/
**Feb 26, 2021**:
"Holzer’s defense team argued that **his suffering of fetal alcohol syndrome** influenced his development into adulthood and contributed to his “unmet and overwhelming need to seem more important than he is.”
https://www.disability-benefits-help.org/disabling-conditions/fetal-alcohol-syndrome-and-social-security-disability
"The birth defects resulting from Fetal Alcohol Syndrome are caused by alcohol crossing the placenta to the fetus. Some of the affects of alcohol on the fetus are stunted growth and weight, a damaged central nervous system, including impaired brain functioning, and deformities of the head and face. Children can be born with an addiction to alcohol, mental health problems, behavioral problems, attention deficit disorder,learning disabilities, poor memory, heart abnormalities, and brain damage, **including mental retardation**."
If a random person tries to become your friend, that person is an undercover agent. Knowing this lure them into a trap before they entrap you. A bear trap.
If a random person tries to become your friend, that person is an undercover agent. Knowing this lure them into a trap before they entrap you. A bear trap.
I try to make new friends all the time. After all, a stranger is just a friend you haven't met yet.
I try to make new friends all the time. After all, a stranger is just a friend you haven't met yet.
A rapist is just a partner you haven't consented to yet!!!
plz no
>A rapist is just a partner you haven't consented to yet!!!
plz no
It's true though! just consent and you can't be raped anymore.
It's true though! just consent and you can't be raped anymore.
Glow less.
Glow less.
Be friendlier
Be friendlier
If you see an FBI agent and don't kill it, you're a fucking coward, straight up.
If you see an FBI agent and don't kill it, you're a fucking coward, straight up.
What's your count?
What's your count?
Every fucking time.
Every fucking time.
Bow does the FBI "intercept a bomb plot" when they were the ones who created the plot in the first place?
Bow does the FBI "intercept a bomb plot" when they were the ones who created the plot in the first place?
Kill
All
Federal
Agents.
Kill
All
Federal
Agents.
>[The true threat doctrine was established in the 1969 Supreme Court case Watts v. United States. In that case, an eighteen-year-old male was convicted in a Washington, D.C. District Court for violating a statute prohibiting persons from knowingly and willfully making threats to harm or kill the President of the United States. The conviction was based on a statement made by Watts, in which he said, "[i]f they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J." Watts appealed, leading to the Supreme Court finding the statute constitutional on its face, but reversing the conviction of Watts. In reviewing the lower court's analysis of the case, the Court noted that "a threat must be distinguished from what is constitutionally protected speech." The Court recognized that "uninhibited, robust, and wideopen" political debate can at times be characterized by "vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." In light of the context of Watts' statement - and the laughter that it received from the crowd - the Court found that it was more "a kind of very crude offensive method of stating a political opposition to the President" than a "true threat." In so holding, the Court established that there is a "true threat" exception to protected speech, but also that the statement must be viewed in its context and distinguished from protected hyperbole. The opinion, however, stopped short of defining precisely what constituted a "true threat." ](https://archive.md/zCQfy)
[Nothing specific. Nothing actionable. No times. No places. No dates. No events. No names. This is what protected speech looks like.](#spoiler)
This type of shit is SOP for the glownigger feds, give a mentally deficient person the means to do damage then arrest. This poor guy isn't a "terrorist" he's a victim of the feds.
This type of shit is SOP for the glownigger feds, give a mentally deficient person the means to do damage then arrest. This poor guy isn't a "terrorist" he's a victim of the feds.
The Faggot Butt Injectors gotta justify their bloated budgets and pensions somehow. MOST 'domestic terrrizm' plots they bust were designed by (((them))).
The Faggot Butt Injectors gotta justify their bloated budgets and pensions somehow. MOST 'domestic terrrizm' plots they bust were designed by (((them))).
They have to make it look like they do something? Otherwise what good are they?
They have to make it look like they do something? Otherwise what good are they?
Look I agree these scumbags entrap teens unfairly in a “wAr On dRUgs” that does more harm than good, but all of a sudden you trust Huffington Post and a writer named Newman?
Make up your minds!
Look I agree these scumbags entrap teens unfairly in a “wAr On dRUgs” that does more harm than good, but all of a sudden you trust Huffington Post and a writer named Newman?
Make up your minds!
Are you saying the story is made up?
Are you saying the story is made up?
You know, you have a good point! Check your sources.
You know, you have a good point! Check your sources.
(post is archived)