No, he is a shill. He pushes pro-jewish demoralization propaganda as often as possible. He frequently attempts to instigate violence as a glowie. On voat, many years ago, he admitted he is a shill and was widely known by the old regulars.
He instantly changed his behavior when it was observed he projects homosexual fears in the middle east. He actively subverts and derails all productive discussions and torments and twists into demoralization propaganda whenever possible. His impact here is minimized because it's harder for him to rig and game the system.
Absolutely no one who says he is okay can be trusted. At best case it proves they are incapable of deep thought and meaningful analysis.
TallestShill is also well known at working multiple accounts to slowly boost his account. He did this like crazy on voat. Over 48 hours his dumbest comments would slowly receive up votes while good comments would get nothing.
He is a shill and anyone claiming otherwise absolutely cannot be trusted.
"shill" = someone I don't agree with. Too tough, find your "safge space" somewhere else, facebook maybe
Lol. No. I use the dictionary correct definition. Your dishonest attempt to spin it says everything about you.
I notice you didn't actually cite your definition. Here have the one used by urban dictionary. ?A person engaged in covert advertising. The shill attempts to spread buzz by personally endorsing the product in public forums with the pretense of sincerity, when in fact he is being paid for his services.
Nopw point to my posts that justify that definition, snowflake.
(post is archived)