# **Prof. Roland Wiesendanger (University of Hamburg) compiled a total of 600 leads to prove it!!!** Since the beginning of the corona pandemic, there have been two basic theses about the origin of the virus. They read: The virus was transmitted from bats to humans. And: the virus was artificially produced and released in a laboratory in Wuhan. A recent study by the World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that it was more likely that transmission of bats via intermediate hosts, a so-called zoonosis, was the origin of the corona pandemic. Now there is a new study that comes to the exact opposite conclusion. The Hamburg nanoscientist Prof. Roland Wiesendanger (59) collected evidence from 2019 and 2020 and is then certain: "The information about the virus itself and numerous publications in specialist journals, including on social media, show that Corona was a laboratory accident. Corona came from a laboratory in Wuhan!" “In contrast to earlier coronavirus-related epidemics such as SARS and MERS, until today, i. H. Well over a year after the outbreak of the current pandemic, no intermediate host animal could be identified that could have enabled the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 pathogens from bats to humans", said Prof. Wiesendanger. "The zoonosis theory as a possible explanation for the pandemic therefore has no sound scientific basis". The fact that the SARS-CoV-2 viruses couple surprisingly well to human cell receptors and can penetrate human cells would speak in favor of a virus from the laboratory. Two special properties made this possible. "Both together were previously unknown in the case of coronaviruses and indicate a non-natural origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen," said the scientist. Prof. Wiesendanger goes on to state that bats were not offered at the fish market in the center of Wuhan, which is often referred to as the epicenter. But: “The virological institute in the city of Wuhan has one of the world's largest collections of bat pathogens, which originate from distant caves in southern Chinese provinces. It is extremely unlikely that bats would have made their way naturally to Wuhan from this distance of nearly 2,000 km and then triggered a worldwide pandemic in the immediate vicinity of this virological institute", he argues. In addition to other evidence, a young scientist from the virological institute in Wuhan was the first to be infected. In total, Prof. Wiesendanger cites 60 evidence for his theory in the study. “I only included serious evidence in the study that can be evaluated according to scientific criteria. However, I have collected around 600 references in total". Prof. Wiesendanger comes to the conclusion: "Both the number and the quality of the evidence speak for a laboratory accident at the virological institute in Wuhan as the cause of the current pandemic". https://www.bild.de/bild-plus/ratgeber/gesundheit/gesundheit/professor-sicher-corona-kam-doch-aus-einem-labor-in-wuhan-75430738,view=conversionToLogin.bild.html