> You've created a strawman argument by pointing to entertainment No. I stated, in my first post (which you responded to), that jews are entirely responsible for introducing that degenerate shit into the Western world. Here, I quote myself: > We literally wouldn't be dealing with the societal poison that is recreational drugs if it wasn't for such shitty Jazz-age jews as (((Mezz Mezzrow))), who nearly single-handedly made pot popular. Allow me to spell out my argument slowly for you: * Jews introduced pot to us. We had no references to or use of it before jews' introduction. * The jews responsible introduced pot in the 1920s, colloquially known as the 'Jazz Age' * I gave an example of one of the jews responsible * This particular jewish example advertised pot so hard that it came to be known after his name, which is sourced from the wiki article (known as 'Mezz', back then) I glossed over nothing, and misdirected to nothing. Everything you have mentioned thus far is moot, as you haven't refuted any of these points. You aren't even talking about the same time period - the term 'reefer' wasn't even coined until over a decade later.   I should remind you that jews commonly promote degeneracy by presenting it to everyone with easily fallibly arguments, while omitting any valid reasons (called 'lying by omission'). See: * 'sex education' in Americas * the FBI running the Silk Road for 2 years, even though they had completely taken it over + how (((they))) essentially told everyone how to find and buy from the Silk Road every time they made a 'PSA' about how terrible it was * promoting polygamy through deliberately weakened arguments for monogamy The examples are duplicitous. But before they could reverse-promote pot (through the controlled opposition you mention), they had to introduce it, and I explained how this happened.