WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

289

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

You sure know how to lay a dystopia bare don't you.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Thought it was obvious stuff.

Didnt mention a lot like how our laws are so contradictory and subjective that one can pick and choose which to abide by. Or how they are claiming pornhub to be engaged in human trafficking when if honest at worse they can be claimed to have hosted illegal material.

A thing no site of appropriate size that offers the ability to post freely and with privacy can prevent. Nor should they be expected to. Faulting sites for it is another eternal excuse. An ultimate weapon if you will.

Im far from a lawyer but if any sense was used in its crafting section 230 should protect a site that attempts to obey the law from what its users post. If pornhub has committed any crimes against humanity it is the destruction of anothers creation.

[–] 1 pt

Im far from a lawyer but if any sense was used in its crafting section 230 should protect a site that attempts to obey the law from what its users post.

Yep, otherwise fags in china, israel, et al, can post vile shit and get you shut down before you can ban them.

[–] 0 pt

Well thats what we have happening now. However some are immune no matter the reason while everyone else can go get fucked. 8chan for example had enough users to form their own state. The deeds of a few people is all it took for the site to be destroyed.

If we genuinely applied that standard to any major site or even a nation without exception I think its safe to say each one would be destroyed. It should take more than shitposting to cripple or destroy a site. Especially so when its hosted in a nation that claims to value liberty.

Extreme reactions to a percent of a percent is a major part of the current absurdity of the world. Its a lovely excuse that never grows old for some people.