WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

It's a prison word. A "lockdown" is what you do when you're the warden and a massive chimpout is spooling up. Look at the wikipedia edits over the past year. The definition has changed.

Military also. We were put under a lot of lockdowns.

[–] 0 pt

"River city" is another term for it. They have so many varieties!

[–] 3 pts

ineffectual (planned purpose) EXPENSIVE and COSTLY and IMPOSSIBLE to administer "plans" of LIBERALS (actually GOVERNMENT). Typical when you think about it.

[–] 3 pts

2.2M people are going to die in the United States if this is left unchecked!!!!1! Some discredited dude in the UK said so! Why don't you believe us, goy?

[–] 2 pts

More like 6 million tbh. Every out-of-work citizen who finds themselves hated, in depression, no medical, a lifetime of debt, eating shit food, and now living in a new dangerous neighborhood which they can barely afford.

[–] 1 pt

The Sodomite Jew Report.

[–] 0 pt

Exactly. I’m not giving my time to jewy jewensteen and his band of kikes as they pander to the crowds for shekels.

[–] 0 pt

Who cares? Communists and fascists needed them. And steeple delivered.

[–] 0 pt

More damage was done by shutting down the economy than was done by the virus. What we should have done, day one. Take the first born child up to our highest peak and sacrificed them to Jesus

[–] 0 pt

Every 1% drop in GDP results in approx. 37,000 premature deaths in the US. The UNWFP estimated that 145 million people in developing nations would face starvation as a result of reduced production caused by lockdowns. All to save a few octogenarians that have one foot the grave and the other on its edge anyway.

[–] 0 pt

I swear I've lost probably 10-15 years off my life over the course of less than 2 years.

Probably 20 years off my lifespan if you count all the riots and terrorism by the left/government over the course of the last six.

Those are years I'll never get back.

[–] 0 pt

CDC pulls science out from their ass.

[–] 0 pt

Beijing is not nowhere!

[–] 0 pt

Thanks. Lockdowns of even a month initially would've not been insane.

[–] -2 pt

Lockdowns do work to prevent the spread of disease though.

[–] 1 pt

Why is the spread less in non locked down scandanavian countries?

Prove it.

[–] 0 pt

Look at every country or state that has imposed lockdowns and the rate of infection falls during that period.

Look at when the lockdowns are eased and the rate of infection rises.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

[–] 0 pt

The problem with that hypothesis is that at some point lockdowns have to be eased, and at that point infections spike anyway. Once a virus enters a community it doesn’t really go away so what purpose is served by trying to avoid infection in the short term if you’re going to get it at some point anyway?

Or does testing coincide with lockdowns? How about countries or states that have no lockdowns? Their overall numbers are lower. Plus, is it worth to mental health and economies to lockdown people for an illness with a 99.8 survival rate? Is it reasonable to force people against their will? Do the ends justify the means? You want to save more lives? Remove niggers and jews from society.

>Lockdowns do work to prevent the spread of disease though.

Disease +information

[–] 0 pt

No, they don't. That is a hypothetical by ivory-tower wonks who've never seen any groundwork in reality.

[–] 0 pt

Nope. It’s backed up by the data for every country or state that has imposed lockdowns.

[–] -1 pt

But if more people wore masks, it would reduce the need for lockdowns. Lockdowns are not only inconvenient, but are also economically harmful. Lockdowns should be a last resort.

[–] 0 pt

We don't need masks or lockdowns. Fuck you and

What?! Masks don't work you dumb fuck. Show me a study that says they do.

The masks confuse the virus as to where your nose is. Especially of you wear 3 or more.